OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

For guitars of the straight waisted variety (or reverse offset).
User avatar
BMWRider
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2023 9:47 am

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by BMWRider » Tue Dec 26, 2023 12:23 pm

I have had a few Ricks over the years, guitars and a bass. I searched out a replacement for my original 2008 Mapleglo 330/6, but since I wanted binding, I bought a 2022 360/6. Sounds great, though it is a personal preference.

User avatar
MrFingers
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1565
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:50 am
Location: Puss Creek - Brussels - Belgium

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by MrFingers » Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:44 pm

wproffitt wrote:
Sat Sep 30, 2023 9:35 pm
Congratulations! I see you have the thumb rest added to the bridge pickup. This seems like the most sensible thing to do. Enjoy it! They are the coolest basses!
It was the first thing I removed when I got it (no: the second thing, the first thing was that pickguard sticker). I just prefer the cover. Just like on all my basses (P, J, EB3).

Image

Still pretty happy with mine. Yes, it is an ergonomical disaster, an absolute menace to keep dialed in and to blend in a mix, but it has the sound, and it has the look. I have a separate tripod stand for it, so it can sit in the living room. When visitors come it's an instant eye-catcher (whether they know anything about instruments or not).

User avatar
Soniqfreq
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:56 am

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by Soniqfreq » Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:00 pm

Gav Haus wrote:
Tue Aug 08, 2023 9:46 pm
Oooh, I’ll play. I have a very big thing for late 80s - early 90s Rics. Pre-96 move to CNC (sorry to be contrary to the previously stated 86 earlier in this thread), fibreboard topped pickups (80s - mid 91, and easily my favourite sounding hi-gains), glorious necks… all the good things.

Both 330s and 360s from this era have a noticeably different body shape to the modern ones which are really hard to unsee once you have. The horns on the 330s were rounder / less spikes. 360s had the original curves - the post 96 ones are more square and not as pretty to my eye. Im also one of the oddballs who prefer the narrower triangle inlays and the bigger headstocks.
I agree with all your points and your collection is drool worthy. Those early modern-era Rickenbackers are incredible. Here is my 1986 360/6 with the mastery bridge and I think it’s the perfect Ric. It sounds and plays spectacularly. They used mis-matched hi-gains in these (my neck reads around 12k while the bridge is 6.25K) which I think is why they sound so good…and right….it gives you that classic Ric sound (yes, 1980’s alt/post punk and 1990’s shoegaze are my classic Ric sounds…not 1960’s toaster jingle jangle folk). OD, Fuzz and Distortion sound great with these.

I just bought a matching 360/12 from the same year/month/batch….my 360’s long lost fraternal twin! I’ll post a picture of them reunited once it arrives.
Image

User avatar
ryland
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by ryland » Wed Jan 10, 2024 7:48 am

I've been shopping for a 660/6 and noticed that the neck depth specs seem to be all over the place. I had not realized this about Rics...is it a common thing that no two have the same profile, or is it an anomoly of the ones I'm looking at? I'm seeing from .87 - .92 at the fist fret and between .91 and .97 at the 12th, with a range of mix and match values in between for each.

User avatar
Soniqfreq
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:56 am

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by Soniqfreq » Tue Jan 16, 2024 10:09 pm

Since this is OSG…here is a picture of Gumby and Pokey (with friends).

Image

User avatar
Kinx
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:27 am
Location: Czech Republic

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by Kinx » Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:28 am

I've always been intrigued by Rickenbackers; they are quite rare where I live, and it took me a long time to actually try one. The first one I tried was my friend's 80s black 330. I was blown away yet disappointed at the same time. The sound was odd yet beautiful, but the ergonomics reminded me too much of old Hofners and other vintage European brands, albeit with a less trashy vibe.

Then my buddy purchased this beautiful '91 620 out of curiosity:

Image

And I kind of fell in love with it. The sound! It was the sound I'd been hearing on various records for years. It was the same revelation I experienced when I played a proper Jazzmaster for the first time. However, I feel I can't live with it. The idiosyncrasies get the best of me - the ergonomics, the narrow bridge spacing, the frustrating bridge (I had a minor meltdown when setting it up), the truss rod... it's as if they tried to do everything differently from most manufacturers just for the sake of it. I would love to have this kind of sound in my arsenal, but I'm afraid I can't deal with the narrow string spacing at the bridge (the same reason I eventually sold off most of my European guitars).

I made some demos with the 620 on the picture: one showcasing the metal side of higain pickups and a proper one showcasing the classic jangle-jangle.

Does any Ric model come with proper string spacing (think classic Fender) at the bridge?
Check out my band, The Atavists ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eG-HZtrljMg

User avatar
Jonesie
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 4076
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:00 am
Location: Massachusetts

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by Jonesie » Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:55 am

Kinx wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:28 am
I've always been intrigued by Rickenbackers; they are quite rare where I live, and it took me a long time to actually try one. The first one I tried was my friend's 80s black 330. I was blown away yet disappointed at the same time. The sound was odd yet beautiful, but the ergonomics reminded me too much of old Hofners and other vintage European brands, albeit with a less trashy vibe.

Then my buddy purchased this beautiful '91 620 out of curiosity:

Image

And I kind of fell in love with it. The sound! It was the sound I'd been hearing on various records for years. It was the same revelation I experienced when I played a proper Jazzmaster for the first time. However, I feel I can't live with it. The idiosyncrasies get the best of me - the ergonomics, the narrow bridge spacing, the frustrating bridge (I had a minor meltdown when setting it up), the truss rod... it's as if they tried to do everything differently from most manufacturers just for the sake of it. I would love to have this kind of sound in my arsenal, but I'm afraid I can't deal with the narrow string spacing at the bridge (the same reason I eventually sold off most of my European guitars).

I made some demos with the 620 on the picture: one showcasing the metal side of higain pickups and a proper one showcasing the classic jangle-jangle.

Does any Ric model come with proper string spacing (think classic Fender) at the bridge?
I think the Colorado and Dakota models have wider string spacing.

I'll fully admit the Ric bridge can go to hell, tailpiece too. Gotta get a Winfield Harp and Mastery on there to keep yourself out of the way of madness.

But yeah, the Ric thing is the Ric thing. Nothing quite like it, and it does a really cool thing, but you have to really like that thing. I love my 330, for some reason all the quirks work for me.

User avatar
ryland
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by ryland » Wed Feb 14, 2024 8:25 am

Yes, the 660 and 650 models have a wider string spacing, at least at the nut. I just picked up a 660/6 and absolutely love it. I just need to sort out the mild string rattle on the low E.

User avatar
BoringPostcards
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 7097
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:50 am
Location: Newfoundland

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by BoringPostcards » Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:06 pm

Kinx wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:28 am
I've always been intrigued by Rickenbackers; they are quite rare where I live, and it took me a long time to actually try one. The first one I tried was my friend's 80s black 330. I was blown away yet disappointed at the same time. The sound was odd yet beautiful, but the ergonomics reminded me too much of old Hofners and other vintage European brands, albeit with a less trashy vibe.

Then my buddy purchased this beautiful '91 620 out of curiosity:

Image

And I kind of fell in love with it. The sound! It was the sound I'd been hearing on various records for years. It was the same revelation I experienced when I played a proper Jazzmaster for the first time. However, I feel I can't live with it. The idiosyncrasies get the best of me - the ergonomics, the narrow bridge spacing, the frustrating bridge (I had a minor meltdown when setting it up), the truss rod... it's as if they tried to do everything differently from most manufacturers just for the sake of it. I would love to have this kind of sound in my arsenal, but I'm afraid I can't deal with the narrow string spacing at the bridge (the same reason I eventually sold off most of my European guitars).

I made some demos with the 620 on the picture: one showcasing the metal side of higain pickups and a proper one showcasing the classic jangle-jangle.

Does any Ric model come with proper string spacing (think classic Fender) at the bridge?
That’s actually a 610, not a 620. 620s have binding and shark fin inlays.
Det er mig der holder traeerne sammen.

User avatar
Kinx
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:27 am
Location: Czech Republic

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by Kinx » Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:19 am

Ha! thanks for correcting me, I didn't know there is a 610. It was sold to him as a 620 tho, I think the original invoice from Guitar Center Sundset Blvd from the early 90s in the case reads 620 as well. TBH I like this look better ::)
Check out my band, The Atavists ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eG-HZtrljMg

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8968
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by JSett » Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:01 am

This is how my 360 stands currently. It has a Firebird pickup hidden under the Ric casing. I also recently moved the pickup about 1/3" away from the bridge and it fattened up the sound noticably. It now has the Jangle, but with added *ahem* girth...

Image

I really love this guitar
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
BoringPostcards
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 7097
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:50 am
Location: Newfoundland

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by BoringPostcards » Thu Feb 15, 2024 9:06 am

Kinx wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:19 am
Ha! thanks for correcting me, I didn't know there is a 610. It was sold to him as a 620 tho, I think the original invoice from Guitar Center Sundset Blvd from the early 90s in the case reads 620 as well. TBH I like this look better ::)
610s are harder to come by, in my experience. There’s also the 615, which has the accent vibrato.
One of our admins or mods here on OSG used to have a 610. Was it Jay? Can’t remember.
I also like the stripped down look better. It’s why I also prefer the 330, to the 360.
Det er mig der holder traeerne sammen.

User avatar
DaddyDom
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 7:54 pm

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by DaddyDom » Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:48 pm

JSett wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:01 am
This is how my 360 stands currently. It has a Firebird pickup hidden under the Ric casing. I also recently moved the pickup about 1/3" away from the bridge and it fattened up the sound noticably. It now has the Jangle, but with added *ahem* girth...

Image

I really love this guitar
So do i! I could see Peter Buck wrangling this forever.

I love single-pickup guitars but the recent purchase of my ES125TDC has me right confused with too much choice, after years of LPJr and Esquire action.

And although Gibson are now conveniently offering them, how did you find your Firebird pickup, may I ask? A true FB pu is my favourite after the P90.
I must say, though, that new Epi/Gibson/Customshop/crap-name Firebird 1 is on my radar.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8968
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by JSett » Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:19 pm

DaddyDom wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 12:48 pm
how did you find your Firebird pickup, may I ask? A true FB pu is my favourite after the P90.
It sounds great in this! It's extremely jangly, maybe even more so than traditional Ric pickups. It sounds kinda HiFi in a way. I need to try and sort a decent demo of it someday
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
ryland
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: OSG Rickenbacker (and Rickenfaker) thread?

Post by ryland » Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:20 pm

JSett wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:01 am
This is how my 360 stands currently. It has a Firebird pickup hidden under the Ric casing. I also recently moved the pickup about 1/3" away from the bridge and it fattened up the sound noticably. It now has the Jangle, but with added *ahem* girth...

Image

I really love this guitar
This is an amazing guitar! I have a set of Firebird pickups in a Jazzmaster and was thinking just yesterday that they're fairly close to the sound of Ric toasters, but maybe more hi-fi. Awesome.

Post Reply