1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Discussion of vintage Jazzmasters, Jaguars, Bass VIs, Electric XIIs and any other offset-waist instruments.
Post Reply
User avatar
JONFROMJERSEY
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:19 am

1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by JONFROMJERSEY » Sat Nov 03, 2018 2:23 pm

Back in 1992 or 93 I bought a Dakota Red Mustang at a pawn shop. I think it is a 65 or 66. Anyway, it was well-played and the paint was chipped in many places. Underneath the Dakota Red, which looks to be original, or at least very old (lots of crazing etc...) is some white and even blue paint, as well as visible wood. I am convinced the Dakota Red finish is original, so who can explain the white and blue? I wish I could attach some photos here, but I cannot seem to be able to do that... Thanks.

User avatar
countertext
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2933
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Tacoma

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by countertext » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:33 am

OSG doesn’t host images, so you can’t upload to it. You have to link to the photo’s web location, which is to say that it has to be hosted on an image hosting site (usually flickr, in my case).

You insert the img tags from the buttons above ^ and put the url of the image’s location between them. The most common error, I think, is to insert the url of a “viewer” page where you scroll or click through images rather than the real address of the image itself. My go-to move is right-clicking an image and using “open image in a new tab” to get to the image’s actual page. Then you can copy that url and insert it here. Some websites don’t allow the right-click trick to prevent theft of images, but it usually works.

Here’s the first pic I ever managed to post correctly:
Image

It’s the img tags around this url: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6215/628 ... 646ac6.jpg
That’s what flickr’s individual photo locations look like.

Most of us here would love to see some pics of your Mustang.

User avatar
JONFROMJERSEY
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:19 am

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by JONFROMJERSEY » Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:30 am

Ok I will try to make some photos available. Thanks!


User avatar
Jaguar018
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 7032
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:48 am
Location: Burbs of Washington DC

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by Jaguar018 » Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:58 am

If you really want to check, take the neck and pickguard off. Look in the neck pocket, and around the pickups and cavities. With that blue underneath, it's certainly a refin, but the question is when was it done, and by whom?

User avatar
JONFROMJERSEY
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:19 am

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by JONFROMJERSEY » Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:13 am

I have disassembled the guitar in the past. No signs of blue or white inside. Just very old Dakota Red.

User avatar
Danley
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:46 am
Location: California Republic

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by Danley » Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:21 am

Was primer even used with the original finishes? I feel like I knew once but forgot.

That said, to a point you could return your guitar to Fender for a refin- and I believe in those instances they would just overspray where they could. Perhaps they'd use primer if they worried about laying two different colors directly above each other. It was also apparently a thing that custom color bodies might get a respray to meet production order changes- that said I don't think any Mustangs are technically custom color, they were production line guitars that were either red, white, or blue.
King Buzzo: I love when people come up to me and say “Your guitar sound was better on Stoner Witch, when you used a Les Paul. “...I used a Fender Mustang reissue on that, dumbass!

User avatar
mbene085
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 4289
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:07 am

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by mbene085 » Tue Nov 06, 2018 11:28 pm

Danley wrote:
Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:21 am
Was primer even used with the original finishes? I feel like I knew once but forgot.
The answer is yes, sometimes.

Due to the exploding demand for their guitars in the mid-60's, there are no hard and fast rules. Some colours could be sprayed with a primer one week, and then the next they'd skip it because they were so backlogged. Also, colours that "didn't" get primer coats are sometimes found with primer coats. It was the wild Wild West in the finishing department.

Mustangs were cheaper guitars and often don't have primer...but then sometimes they do!

User avatar
JONFROMJERSEY
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:19 am

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by JONFROMJERSEY » Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:23 am

So then it was probably blue and then repainted red by Fender to meet customer demand?

User avatar
scottT
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2426
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:39 am

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by scottT » Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:43 am

The white looks more like Desert Sand (beige) which was frequently used as an undercoat on colors like Daphne Blue which would be right for that guitar. Of course Dakota is right for that model as well. It wouldn't be unheard of for Fender to factory spray color over color like this. Pretty cool!

User avatar
zip73
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 715
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:10 pm

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by zip73 » Wed Nov 07, 2018 12:25 pm

JONFROMJERSEY wrote:
Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:23 am
So then it was probably blue and then repainted red by Fender to meet customer demand?
Yes.

User avatar
mgeek
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:03 pm

Re: 1965/66 Mustang Color Mystery

Post by mgeek » Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:30 am

or because there was a flaw with the blue finish. Much more cost effective to treat that as a base coat and spray a new colour over the top of it

Post Reply