I think I would like the Rocker more if the two channels each had an EQ or shared them? Maybe a toggle that could lift the tone or add the set EQ in to avoid making the faceplate too large?beninma wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:08 pmSweet.. I've had a the Rocker 15 forever now.
I can totally see picking the OR15, having the two channels is sometimes just too much and I wonder if I'd have been better off with just the dirty channel. The dirty channel is by far the easier channel to get used to dialing in.
NAD Orange OR15
- HNB
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 13908
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 7:55 am
- Location: Puyallup, Washington
- Contact:
Re: NAD Orange OR15
Christopher
Lilith Guitars
Lilith Guitars
- beninma
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:31 am
Re: NAD Orange OR15
I totally agree with this actually. 2 channels each with a 3-band EQ would have been a big upgrade, or one shared EQ.HNB wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:49 pmI think I would like the Rocker more if the two channels each had an EQ or shared them? Maybe a toggle that could lift the tone or add the set EQ in to avoid making the faceplate too large?beninma wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:08 pmSweet.. I've had a the Rocker 15 forever now.
I can totally see picking the OR15, having the two channels is sometimes just too much and I wonder if I'd have been better off with just the dirty channel. The dirty channel is by far the easier channel to get used to dialing in.
Any of the combinations really. I have just always found that the Natural channel requires some thought. For some guitars it just seems like there are certain places on the volume dial on the natural channel that just really need an EQ.
I have an EQ on my board it can certainly help. It'd just be better to not have to worry about it.