
Thank you!
Thank you! Strike that amp from considerationwaltkh5 wrote: I had one of these and yes, there was quite an audible hiss with this amp. I did a few things to quiet the amp down. I replaced the speaker cables with something more quality made. The most noticible change was replacing the stock 12ax7 tube with a 12ay7 in the V1 tube slot. This certainly did quiet the amp down and as a result gave it more headroom. The amp did breakup at lower volumes which I didn't care for. Also, the stock blue alnico speakers (Eminence made?) were flubby and farty at higher volumes. Overall, I thought it wasn't a bad amp. Albeit, it sounds nothing like a vintage Vibrolux!
I didn't get the impression that you were dissmissing the amp, but I think the ac_frippy got the impression that it is a heap of noise.waltkh5 wrote: Please don't get the impression that I am dismissing this amp. I used this amp for several years and it never let me down. I didn't part with the amp because of the hiss issues. All tube amps hiss to a degree, even though because of a design flaw, this amp does hiss more any production amp in the Fender lineup - why doesn't Fender remedy this problem?! I parted with this amp because, well it didn't get the tones I wanted. It nailed SRV tones in spades and the vibrato was awesome! I play more rockabilly/surf with a dollop of Chet Atkins thrown in and rarely go into SRV type territory. The reverb did suck, that really has to be my biggest complaint about this amp.
I didn't have that impressionFelix wrote:
I didn't get the impression that you were dissmissing the amp, but I think the ac_frippy got the impression that it is a heap of noise.
I do agree with you about the reverb, though. It is weak. But the tremolo and the gritty break up more than makes up for the shortcomings of the reverb. Did you use humbuckers or single coils? I felt that my JM stayed pretty clean until 4.5, and that was plenty loud for me. If I wanted a guitar=amp setup only, I would go to 5 or 6 and dig in...
That is not a bad place to be, if I do say so myselfacoustic_frippy wrote: Tonally, I fall on the Richard Lloyd/Robert Quine side of the strat tracks![]()
I must agreei love sharin foo wrote: That is not a bad place to be, if I do say so myself![]()
Not all Fender reverb tanks were created equal, evidentlyRumorsOFsurF wrote: What is wrong with the reverb? I have never tried one of these, but I would think the reverb was the same as a DRRI or Twin... Apparently not!
Definitely a nice place to be. I got you now, though. I don't care much for the SRV tone, either, but I found ways to make the amp not be that kind of pony.acoustic_frippy wrote:I didn't have that impressionFelix wrote:
I didn't get the impression that you were dissmissing the amp, but I think the ac_frippy got the impression that it is a heap of noise.
I do agree with you about the reverb, though. It is weak. But the tremolo and the gritty break up more than makes up for the shortcomings of the reverb. Did you use humbuckers or single coils? I felt that my JM stayed pretty clean until 4.5, and that was plenty loud for me. If I wanted a guitar=amp setup only, I would go to 5 or 6 and dig in...
The reason for my comment was two-fold: lower grade wiring and low-end speakers. I expect some hiss on tube amps, which is why I asked about the CVR. The lack of headroom isn't a problem for me but I was looking for more of a classic Vibrolux sound. The reverb issue is a deal breaker, though.
What I gather is that there is little reason for me to move from a Deluxe Reverb to a CVR, especially as I'm loathe to ever sound like SRV. Tonally, I fall on the Richard Lloyd/Robert Quine side of the strat tracks![]()