mixer vs audio interface
- Pingu
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 5793
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:12 pm
- Location: Malmö, Sweden
Re: mixer vs audio interface
You would also need a pretty fancy computer to record 24 tracks at once...
"Anything that doesn't take years of your life and drive you to suicide hardly seems worth doing." - Cormac McCarthy
- northern_dirt
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 14064
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:03 am
- Location: Scarborough
Re: mixer vs audio interface
This mixer he is looking at has a firewire version.. thats $100 cheaper than the USB onefuzzjunkie wrote: mixers like this...Mackie makes a better one...or look at Yamaha...do have an analog to digital converter (which is what an audio card does) but this one accesses the computer via USB, which generally doesn't handle more than 2 tracks at a time well, and not more than 4 without choking. I don't know this device, but I would guess that although you can track and mix live with more than 2 tracks (up to the 24) it would be a stereo mix that goes to the computer...so all the above is partially correct
to have the full 24 track output from the mixer, you would need an audio interface that supports 24 inserts. Mackie makes a digital mixer with a Firewire connection that does this. To track more than 2 tracks with this mixer you'd need dedicated PCI or PCI-e audio cards that can be used in conjunction with each other...such as the Apogee Symphony or RME Hammerfall cards...or there might be M-Audio or other low end cards available.
or as Orang said "....when you have a mixer that can send multiple outputs, you'll also need an audio interface than can accept multiple inputs in order to be able to record more than the standard two channels at once. When you have an audio interface that can do that by itself, you don't need an additional mixer."
'cleanest, best pleasure'
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:50 pm
Re: mixer vs audio interface
that means if i have a mixer with several outputs i also need a soundcard with a lot of inputs. that would make sense. i could use the soundcard only to get the same effect for less money.
i think i'm gonna get an interface with enough inputs to record a band 'live' and mix them digitally...
i think i'm gonna get an interface with enough inputs to record a band 'live' and mix them digitally...

- Pingu
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 5793
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:12 pm
- Location: Malmö, Sweden
Re: mixer vs audio interface
Or you could spend all your money on one great condenser and record Trinity Session-style 

"Anything that doesn't take years of your life and drive you to suicide hardly seems worth doing." - Cormac McCarthy
-
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:50 pm
Re: mixer vs audio interface
okay another question comes up:
what do you guys think of USB condenser mics?
like the samson C01U
what do you guys think of USB condenser mics?
like the samson C01U
- northern_dirt
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 14064
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:03 am
- Location: Scarborough
Re: mixer vs audio interface
I Like the Neumann D-01 as a USB mic...Killamangiro* wrote: okay another question comes up:
what do you guys think of USB condenser mics?
like the samson C01U
'cleanest, best pleasure'