Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
Locked
User avatar
s_mcsleazy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 18437
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:30 am
Location: glasgow

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by s_mcsleazy » Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:13 pm

rank wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 7:12 pm
s_mcsleazy wrote:
Thu Jan 14, 2021 11:47 pm
p.s. there was one picture i always remember that used to get shared around OSG like 10 years ago that made me want a toro even more. it was the toro with the jazzmaster trem being played by a dude with curly hair. people used to think it was me for a bit.
Image
I'm very slowly working on one!
dude, i'd get that finished, mainly because it's right down my ally...... BECAUSE IT'S BROWN
offset guitars resident bass player.
'Are you trying to seduce me Mrs Robinson? Or do you just want me to solder a couple of resistors into your Muff?'

User avatar
Veitchy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
Location: Robe, South Australia

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Veitchy » Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:23 pm

Ceylon wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 3:23 am
Yeah, I reckon it is this. It was a Gibsony enough Fender for the people who preferred the Fender aesthetic but wanted the GIbson sound and feel. By now you can get dual humbucker Strats, dual PAF Teles, Jazzmasters, Jaguars, Mustangs et cetera.
Dual humbuckers, sure, But I wouldn't underestimate the desire by some for the independent vol/tone for each pickup - something often missing from Fender HH offerings. If you're somewhat Les Paul inclined, and especially if you like to get your tones mostly from the guitar, the ability to switch between different voicings or blend them together is indispensable IMO.

User avatar
Larry Mal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19725
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Larry Mal » Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:39 pm

Right. Fender should actually try and do two things, make great Fender guitars that already exist, and design new great Fender guitars.

What they should not do is make worse Gibson guitars. The Toronado, like a lot of recent Fenders, has the inexcusable flaw of being fucking ugly.

How you make an electric guitar be ugly, I dunno. Yet Fender does it over and over and over.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.

User avatar
CivoLee
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:22 pm

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by CivoLee » Fri Jan 15, 2021 11:24 pm

Larry Mal wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:39 pm
Right. Fender should actually try and do two things, make great Fender guitars that already exist, and design new great Fender guitars.

What they should not do is make worse Gibson guitars. The Toronado, like a lot of recent Fenders, has the inexcusable flaw of being fucking ugly.

How you make an electric guitar be ugly, I dunno. Yet Fender does it over and over and over.
I never thought the Toronado was "ugly" per se, but in those days I thought of HH guitars as "generic"; so in my mind it wasn't a "real" offset. I did kind of like the Black Dove P90 version of the American Special Toros, but I couldn't afford one at the time.

In reality, an HH Toronado would've probably suited me better for the band I would eventually play in better than the guitars I did have, though at that time the only Toro you could buy new was the Competition model, which wouldn't have suited the band's aesthetic at all...

Sauerkraut
Expat
Expat
Posts: 2827
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:23 am

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Sauerkraut » Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:04 am

Larry Mal wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:39 pm
The Toronado, like a lot of recent Fenders, has the inexcusable flaw of being fucking ugly.
Agreed. It looks like a Jazzmaster's obese uncle.

User avatar
MayTheFuzzBeWithYou
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2421
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:28 am
Location: Linz, Austria

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by MayTheFuzzBeWithYou » Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:08 am

I always liked the big guard toronado models (competition stripe models were never my thing and the small guard model also looked lame in comparison) - and yes „Can‘t Stop“ was also one of my favorite songs back then...
but I wanted the yellow one (but couldn‘t afford it at 16 and was even more into my black Epiphone Les Paul) back then... (did you know that Squier offered a Les Paul shaped guitar somewhen between 2005 and 2008?
And does anyone know where to get all those old Fender Frontline magazines as a pdf? I‘ve thrown mine away after they were almost ripped apart by browsing through them so many times...)

I wish the Toronado came with an offset vibrato and I like the recreations of it I see here among the OSG crowd.

As it was unavailable for such a long time I was really thrilled when I saw the Squier announcement. And as Squier impressed me quite some times before (J Mascis, VM Jag - and even straighr out of the box: Bullet Mustang and CV Jag :-* ) I was really disappointed when I grabbed and played the Squier Toronado at my local guitar store... the pots were loose, the fret-ends were sharp, the pickups sounded unbalanced - basically a really shitty guitar!

I still like the look of them. And I like the attributes (would put some P90s or Surf 90s in there probably) - I also like the body and pickup shape of the powercaster (I just really dislike the control positioning and would love to see a trem version too), I also really liked the Sixty-Six except the Strat Trem... so there are some really good ideas - but probably a secret council of osg-ers should be hired by Fender! ;)

User avatar
blunderbuss
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2020 3:58 pm

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by blunderbuss » Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:27 am

I always liked the Toro but never got one. I remember many times nearly buying one online. But I could never find them in stock in a store. Back then the scale, humbuckers, and hardtail were all big pluses for me. May still get one someday.

I also really like SGs but could never fathom giving Gibson money.
Ryan

User avatar
Fiddy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 12395
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Canada Dry

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Fiddy » Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:45 am

The Toronado is my least favorite Fender guitar... They're kinda ugly.. They're not a monstrosity but, not really a classy looking guitar Imo.

User avatar
seenoevil II
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:59 pm

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by seenoevil II » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:04 am

Because the density of cultural production and decision making slowed way down between the 60's and the 2000's. Fender became a staid, ossified unwieldy large organization.

Culturally, things became pretty samey between the late 90's and 2010. We've only recently become unstuck such that the youths are aping the early 90s for inspiration.

But I'm getting mad nostalgic for the 2000s and the toronado is part of that. Back when they roamed the earth, fender made only one, totally vintage correct jazzmaster, and it came in all the custom colors and only cost $1400. A decade defined by wearing T shirts and not- tight jeans.
If it wasn't for disappointment, I wouldn't have any appointments.

User avatar
Larry Mal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19725
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Larry Mal » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:11 am

I don't think it's that, I think that guitar culture became insular and weirdly focused on the past, and guitarists punish innovation to a degree not seen in any other industry I can think of. Maybe the whale oil lamp industry is more devoted to the past, or the butter churn boys, maybe the hand-smithed pennyfarthing lead bicycle industry.

I can't imagine it's fun being a guitar company these days, I still have to wonder what kind of depression would lead someone to design something like the Toronado. I mean, the basics of making a great design are universal, and the Toronado ignores all of them. It's God-awful.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.

User avatar
Larry Mal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19725
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Larry Mal » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:40 am

seenoevil II wrote:
Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:04 am
A decade defined by wearing T shirts and not- tight jeans.
I get what you are saying... the Toronado is the "loose fit" in the guitar world.

Makes sense. I hated the "loose fit" era and it was ugly and awful.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.

Sauerkraut
Expat
Expat
Posts: 2827
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:23 am

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Sauerkraut » Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:41 am

Toronados are Fender‘s Poochie

Image

User avatar
Embenny
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 10363
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:07 am

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by Embenny » Sat Jan 16, 2021 12:20 pm

Sauerkraut wrote:
Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:41 am
Toronados are Fender‘s Poochie

Image
This is so spot-on in so many ways that I'm dying. 10/10.
The artist formerly known as mbene085.

User avatar
andy_tchp
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8040
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:36 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by andy_tchp » Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:32 pm

Sauerkraut wrote:
Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:41 am
...Poochie
Outstanding.
"I don't know why we asked him to join the band 'cause the rest of us don't like country music all that much; we just like Graham Lee."
David McComb, 1987.

User avatar
rank
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:35 am

Re: Why did the Toronado outlast most other post-1964 Fender solidbodies in terms of lifespan?

Post by rank » Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:58 pm

The Toronado is actually the first guitar that was designed & produced by Fender Mexico (or whatever it is called) in their Ensenada plant. In an interesting turn of events, Fender USA paid quite a compliment by developing a US made version (the small pick guard one). While it may not be for everyone, the Toronado holds a significant place in Fender's history.
We are merely moving shadows.

Locked