Damn, are Surfcasters...

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8967
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by JSett » Wed Oct 06, 2021 12:32 pm

...really this much now?!?

I should have snapped one up a decade ago.
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
SignoftheDragon
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Utah, USA
Contact:

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by SignoftheDragon » Wed Oct 06, 2021 1:58 pm

Finally getting the attention they deserve... now that I'm down to only 2. :fp:

I have a bucket-list goal to own a surf12 in all 6 original colors. I've owned all the colors, just not at the same time. Almost had it once, but times & economies have risen and fallen since then. If you search on here for "surfcaster" and go back far enough you'll find the whole sad story.

My 2 current ones are hanging out in the basement in the harem of XII:

Image
Last edited by SignoftheDragon on Wed Oct 06, 2021 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Veitchy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:12 am
Location: Robe, South Australia

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by Veitchy » Wed Oct 06, 2021 2:08 pm

Gear is certainly more expensive than it's ever been, but that feels optimistic to me.

Edit: I just realised that's in Pounds. I feel like that's got to be taking the piss a bit.

User avatar
Larry Mal
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19735
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by Larry Mal » Wed Oct 06, 2021 2:36 pm

It's like everyone decided that guitars cost a thousand more of whatever currency than they did before Covid.
Back in those days, everyone knew that if you were talking about Destiny's Child, you were talking about Beyonce, LaTavia, LeToya, and Larry.

User avatar
Fiddy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 12396
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Canada Dry

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by Fiddy » Thu Oct 07, 2021 3:49 am

Maybe, not a $1000, but worse.. Either double or triple...

There's a Squier Affinity listed locally for $280, those have always been around $100-$120, or even less in the used market.

User avatar
iainmayfield
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:18 am

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by iainmayfield » Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:33 am

hmmm.... I have one of these and a xii in sea foam - thought i'd get a matching pair at the time.... nice to see they have maintained their value!

User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 7193
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:05 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by UlricvonCatalyst » Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 am

I always say the asking price is one thing but it's only the sold price that actually means anything.

I'd reckon on them being in the same ballpark as CIJ Jazzmasters, personally, with maybe a 10-20% bump for comparative rarity value. Pity whoever owns the Charvel name nowadays didn't reissue them rather than letting Eastwood get their mitts on them.

User avatar
SignoftheDragon
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Utah, USA
Contact:

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by SignoftheDragon » Fri Oct 08, 2021 8:02 am

iainmayfield wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:33 am
hmmm.... I have one of these and a xii in sea foam - thought i'd get a matching pair at the time.... nice to see they have maintained their value!
SUPERJELLY!

Of all the Surfcasters I've been forced to sell, my surf green 12 still hurts the most.

Followed by the orange one.

And the burst one.

:fp:

User avatar
Fiddy
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 12396
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Canada Dry

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by Fiddy » Fri Oct 08, 2021 8:10 am

UlricvonCatalyst wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 am
I always say the asking price is one thing but it's only the sold price that actually means anything.

I'd reckon on them being in the same ballpark as CIJ Jazzmasters, personally, with maybe a 10-20% bump for comparative rarity value. Pity whoever owns the Charvel name nowadays didn't reissue them rather than letting Eastwood get their mitts on them.
Nah, the market is saturated with cij/mij jazzmasters. Surfcasters are rare. CIJ/MIJ jazzmasters aren't.

User avatar
CivoLee
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:22 pm

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by CivoLee » Fri Oct 08, 2021 9:13 am

UlricvonCatalyst wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 am
I always say the asking price is one thing but it's only the sold price that actually means anything.

I'd reckon on them being in the same ballpark as CIJ Jazzmasters, personally, with maybe a 10-20% bump for comparative rarity value. Pity whoever owns the Charvel name nowadays didn't reissue them rather than letting Eastwood get their mitts on them.
Charvel did do a reissue of sorts as the "Skatecaster", part of the "Desolation Series" in the mid '10s, but like everything they have done since their mid-2000s revival they were very hard rock/metal-focused; solidbody/HH/EMGs/Floyd Rose/tunamatic bridges. And now Jackson has the "Shadowcaster" signature model for one of the guitarists in Volbeat. I honestly can't tell which one of them owns the design now, because neither Charvel nor Jackson have it listed as a body option on their Custom Select order forms...

When Eastwood released their reissue, I emailed them to ask if an HT (the one like Scott Ian from Anthrax played) reissue would be available but didn't get a reply. When I first started playing, the Surfcaster HT (or even the Jackson SC-1) was my dream guitar.

User avatar
SignoftheDragon
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Utah, USA
Contact:

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by SignoftheDragon » Fri Oct 08, 2021 9:53 am

CivoLee wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 9:13 am
UlricvonCatalyst wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 am
I always say the asking price is one thing but it's only the sold price that actually means anything.

I'd reckon on them being in the same ballpark as CIJ Jazzmasters, personally, with maybe a 10-20% bump for comparative rarity value. Pity whoever owns the Charvel name nowadays didn't reissue them rather than letting Eastwood get their mitts on them.
Charvel did do a reissue of sorts as the "Skatecaster", part of the "Desolation Series" in the mid '10s, but like everything they have done since their mid-2000s revival they were very hard rock/metal-focused; solidbody/HH/EMGs/Floyd Rose/tunamatic bridges. And now Jackson has the "Shadowcaster" signature model for one of the guitarists in Volbeat. I honestly can't tell which one of them owns the design now, because neither Charvel nor Jackson have it listed as a body option on their Custom Select order forms...

When Eastwood released their reissue, I emailed them to ask if an HT (the one like Scott Ian from Anthrax played) reissue would be available but didn't get a reply. When I first started playing, the Surfcaster HT (or even the Jackson SC-1) was my dream guitar.
Yeah, the Skatecaster did absolutely nothing for fans of the originals- just sort of a nod in the general direction with the body shape. I've picked up 2 of them- a SC-1(Neck-thru) and an SC-3 (bolt-on) at bargain prices and they are actually terrific guitars if you're looking for a basic HH shredder or punk-rock machine.

Jackson's custom shop also put out several one-off Surfcasters, but missed the mark just as badly- Just hot-rodded HH superstrats that happened to have offset-shaped bodies.

The Eastwood re-issue is a passable guitar, actually a pretty great guitar- (I've had 3 of the 12-strings now) but it definitely could never be mistaken for an original. SOO many major differences that a 'tribute' is only marginally applicable.

User avatar
vistavision
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 605
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:37 pm
Location: PacNW

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by vistavision » Fri Oct 08, 2021 10:14 am

UlricvonCatalyst wrote:
Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:43 am
Pity whoever owns the Charvel name nowadays didn't reissue them rather than letting Eastwood get their mitts on them.
Fender owns Jackson/Charvel. The king of reissuing stuff. Go figure. But the Surfcaster was always so outside of Charvel's wheelhouse that a modern reissue would never have made sense with the size runs FMIC would need to do. Even Eastwood did it as part of their crowdfunded reissue program. (And then they put a 6 screw Strat trem on it. :fp: )
I'm sure some Fender dealer in '64 looked at the new Duo-Sonic II and thought, "That's not a Duo-Sonic. That's a Mustang".

User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 7193
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:05 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by UlricvonCatalyst » Sat Oct 09, 2021 12:24 am

Having completely missed the Skatecasters I just did an image search and it really drives home how right Charvel got the aesthetcs with the Surfcasters (if you skip past the pointy headstock ones); largely tasteful solid finishes with only the sunburst variant falling down the tiger-stripe/flame rabbit-hole.

I guess if Rickenbacker introduced a semi-hollow offset body shape - right after Nelson gets his eye back courtesy of a flying pig - it'd be the go-to placeholder for those who long for a proper Surfcaster.

User avatar
JSett
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8967
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by JSett » Wed Oct 27, 2021 1:56 am

In case anyone hadn't noticed, this has been gradually chipped down from the initial £2500 to now just £1300

I'd buy it but I KNOW the neck is gonna be too thin for my taste. Might be a good deal for someone here
Silly Rabbit, don't you know scooped mids are for kids?

User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 7193
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:05 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Damn, are Surfcasters...

Post by UlricvonCatalyst » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:30 am

johnnysomersett wrote:
Wed Oct 27, 2021 1:56 am
down from the initial £2500 to now just £1300.... Might be a good deal for someone here
TELL HIM HE'S DREAMIN'!!!

Post Reply