"Thin skin" JM

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
User avatar
lofi73
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 328
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Copenhagen,Denmark

"Thin skin" JM

Post by lofi73 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:11 pm

Hi
How many in here own one of these?.Can you share a bit of your personal experiences with this guitar?.
I like the specs so much on this guitar i just might go crazy and order one.Are those pickups any different from the regular AVRI 62´s?...Could´nt find proper info on that.
Thx! :)

User avatar
RumorsOFsurF
Mods
Mods
Posts: 17599
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by RumorsOFsurF » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:05 pm

I don't own one, but many here do.  They are nice looking guitars.  The fretboard radius turns me off, as I prefer 7.25".  That's just personal preference, though.

I'm pretty sure the pickups are just AVRI. 
Damn kids, get off my lawn!

User avatar
lofi73
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 328
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Copenhagen,Denmark

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by lofi73 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:55 pm

Yeah i prefer the 7.25 too but i have no problem with the 9.5" radius as such.It might seem a little odd on the JM...But hey why not.It could make a very different and interesting guitar.I am sooo tempted! :DI have no chance of trying one out as noone is selling them over here.

User avatar
maximum_perlich
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by maximum_perlich » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:34 pm

I just got my ThinSkin Jag in the mail today.  So far, I love it.  I don't know how it stacks up against other Jags (in terms of pickup sound and all that) since it's my first Jag.
I've got a MIJ JM that I've had for about 9 years that I love but my ThinSkin feels way more "put together".  It has great sustain and plays great (at least to me)...and the shoreline gold color is awesome.
I haven't come to any decision comparing the 7.25 of my JM to the 9.5 of the Jag but both feel fine to me...It really is personal preference.

Anyway, so far so good.  I'm waiting to order one of the 59 JMs that are supposed come out this fall...depending on what color options are available.

User avatar
Mr. Peabody
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:22 am
Location: Brooklyn NY
Contact:

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by Mr. Peabody » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:51 pm

Any more details about these '59s coming out in the fall?

User avatar
Stratelejazzuar
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 6744
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by Stratelejazzuar » Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:18 pm

i like my thinskin - it's awesome - shoreline jazzmaster  8)

the only thing i dont' like is that it's new and prone to 'new guitar' issues, like the bridge being so crisp and clean that it moves/adjusts itself over time from usage.

and the components are so fresh and new htat they are very susseptible to temperature changes; ex. some days i can feel the fret edges on the edge of the fretboard, whereas other days i cannot

otherwise it's great - the pickups are on the trebley side, but i only really noticed this after i got my vintage 66 jazzmaster... ( i guess the 66 pickups could be a little worn out and muddy from time, but they don't need as much roll-off of the treble knob)

"my 2p"  ;)

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10048
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by luau » Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:14 am

I have a Shoreline Jazzmaster as well. Great guitar. Personally, I found the high frets to be a bigger change than the radius.
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
Soiouz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:31 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by Soiouz » Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:15 am

Mr. Peabody wrote: Any more details about these '59s coming out in the fall?
+1

How are they going to be? I'm guessing gold guard??  ???

User avatar
maximum_perlich
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by maximum_perlich » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:31 am

Soiouz wrote:
Mr. Peabody wrote: Any more details about these '59s coming out in the fall?
+1

How are they going to be? I'm guessing gold guard??  ???
Brett from Music Machine (where I got my thin skin) told me this:
"In regards to the 59 reissue Jazzmasters, I expect to see them in the 3rd quarter of 08. Right now sunburst and white blonde/ash are confirmed finishes.... there may be a couple of others."

But I know he posts on here so I'm sure he can fill us in if and when he gets more info.

User avatar
RumorsOFsurF
Mods
Mods
Posts: 17599
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by RumorsOFsurF » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:32 am

maximum_perlich wrote:
Soiouz wrote:
Mr. Peabody wrote: Any more details about these '59s coming out in the fall?
+1

How are they going to be? I'm guessing gold guard??   ???
Brett from Music Machine (where I got my thin skin) told me this:
"In regards to the 59 reissue Jazzmasters, I expect to see them in the 3rd quarter of 08. Right now sunburst and white blonde/ash are confirmed finishes.... there may be a couple of others."

But I know he posts on here so I'm sure he can fill us in if and when he gets more info.
Blonde/ash?  :o   :-*

I thought that I have enough Jazzmasters...Until I read that!

One of the guys ("B") from Music Machine is a member here...Maybe he'll tell us more.
Damn kids, get off my lawn!

idiotbear

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by idiotbear » Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:43 pm

I also have a shoreline thin skin Jazzmaster. One word (or smiley)  :?

User avatar
B
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1067
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:33 am
Location: PACIFIC NORTHWEST

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by B » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:58 pm

I own a Sonic Blue ThinSkin JM.  Absolutely the best JM I've owned.  Yeah, the pickups sound like your standard AVRI's.

The '59 ThinSkins are indeed happening, just as quoted above... I was told the 3rd quarter of 08 is when we'd expect to see them.  Of course I will keep all of us posted on here as soon as I learn more about exactly when!

glimmertwin
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by glimmertwin » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:07 pm

Dibs    ;)

....now I have a reason to keep my well paying job for at least another few months. 
"I enjoy the current state of offsetguitars hostility."

idiotbear

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by idiotbear » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:07 pm

glimmertwin wrote: Dibs    ;)

....now I have a reason to keep my well paying job for at least another few months. 
+1 - I may well be calling dibs on a '59 as well  ;) 8)

User avatar
Nord
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:37 pm
Location: Vermont
Contact:

Re: "Thin skin" JM

Post by Nord » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:08 pm

Just talked to the owner at Wildwood guitars and he said they're expecting thinskin JMs in LPB, White, Red, and Sonic Blue this summer. Just tried one in Sea Foam Green that they have in and it sounded great. I agree that the frets and bridge feel a little fresh. Sound and color is stunning though!
sabisound.com

Post Reply