Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

For help with setups and other technical issues.
User avatar
pocaloc
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:40 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by pocaloc » Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:11 am

I’m getting ready to change my pickups in my Jazzmaster. I keep going back and forth between the Lollar Black Bobbin set and the Novak Jm-fat bridge with JM-V neck. My main objective is to actually enjoy playing in the bridge position. Does anyone have any experience with these sets of pickups?

User avatar
rbrcbr
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 763
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by rbrcbr » Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:41 am

I've had both, but at separate times - it's been about two years since I owned the parts jazzy that had Novak the JM-V/JM-Fat combo in it. Currently I have a '59 thin skin reissue that has the Lollar Black Bobbins. Hard for me to compare since I don't have em side by side and I'm trying to not just regurgitate whatever marketing lingo I've read. But the Novaks were maybe a bit cleaner? The black bobbins seem to have a bit of grit to them, still super chimey and round sounding but the Novaks were like sparkly clean if I remember right. I also am running the black bobbins on the 280k pot set up, so it's even harder to compare to the set of Novaks I was running with 1meg pots in 2019.

Either way, you can't really go wrong. The bridge sound on these current pickups sounds great, and the JM-Fat is a really nice bridge tone from what I remember. Both are super usable.

Maybe I'll convince myself to snag a Spitfire guard and load it with Novaks to swap in and out and compare sometime. Good luck with your choice!

User avatar
pocaloc
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:40 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by pocaloc » Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:01 am

Thanks a lot for the information, I appreciate it. :) I’ve been thinking the same thing, that I probably can’t go wrong with either. I’ve had Novak’s before and have always wanted to try Lollar so that’s what I’m leaning towards. Plus they’re a little cheaper.

User avatar
ek11sx
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:21 am

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by ek11sx » Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:41 am

I had an issue with string balance on the black bobbins. The pole piece staggering was the culprit. Very pleasant sounding pickup to me though. Ended up moving to Novak to restore some of the sparkle

Loobster
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:49 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by Loobster » Tue Dec 14, 2021 7:13 am

pocaloc wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:11 am
I’m getting ready to change my pickups in my Jazzmaster. I keep going back and forth between the Lollar Black Bobbin set and the Novak Jm-fat bridge with JM-V neck. My main objective is to actually enjoy playing in the bridge position. Does anyone have any experience with these sets of pickups?
I currently have the JM-V/Fat neck/bridge combo. Love the neck pickup but find the bridge pickup a bit honky and nasal, such is often the case with overwound bridge pickups. I wish it had more cut, chime and high-end but to my ears, it's very midrangey. That might be what you want. The name is quite accurate, in this case. Definitely sounds infinitely better with overdrive than clean. The neck pickup sounds phenomenal whatever setting.

User avatar
Lost In Autumn
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by Lost In Autumn » Wed Dec 15, 2021 3:14 am

What don't you like about the JM bridge pickup experience?

I generally don't like the bridge pickup position generally and Jazzmaster bridge pickups in particular, but one that I've really enjoyed in the jazzmaster form factor, has been Novak's Wide Range Humbucker. It has a fat, twangy sound, clean and it just flat out rips with overdrive, distortion and fuzz. My only complaint is that its a bit out of balance with the Novak Gold Foil JM that I have in the neck, and lowering the pickup to compensate, thins it out a little and takes away what I love some much about the pickup. Still, I've learned to live with it.

User avatar
pocaloc
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:40 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by pocaloc » Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:47 am

I usually like the bridge position best. I don’t like the bridge sound on either a Jaguar or a Jazzmaster. I guess what I don’t like about it could maybe be described as harshness? I usually love sparkle and chime though. I guess I just want it tamed a bit.

User avatar
Lost In Autumn
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by Lost In Autumn » Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:54 am

pocaloc wrote:
Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:47 am
I usually like the bridge position best. I don’t like the bridge sound on either a Jaguar or a Jazzmaster. I guess what I don’t like about it could maybe be described as harshness? I usually love sparkle and chime though. I guess I just want it tamed a bit.
That sums up my experience as well. The WRHB solved it for me, as did Novak‘s Jag V in my old Jaguar.

User avatar
Lost In Autumn
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by Lost In Autumn » Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:54 am

pocaloc wrote:
Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:47 am
I usually like the bridge position best. I don’t like the bridge sound on either a Jaguar or a Jazzmaster. I guess what I don’t like about it could maybe be described as harshness? I usually love sparkle and chime though. I guess I just want it tamed a bit.
That sums up my experience as well. The WRHB solved it for me, as did Novak‘s Jag V in my old Jaguar.

User avatar
pocaloc
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:40 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by pocaloc » Wed Dec 15, 2021 2:15 pm

Thanks for the input. Maybe I'll look into a WRHB.

User avatar
redchapterjubilee
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:01 am
Location: AVLNC

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by redchapterjubilee » Thu Dec 16, 2021 5:42 am

I also find working with a pickup winder to get a +10% bridge overwind to be super beneficial. What I wanted out of a JM-V/JM-FAT setup I actually got from having Pickup Wizard overwind the bridge pickups on a black bobbin style set. 9 years on and I'm still very satisfied. Same goes with his hybrid black bobbin neck/P90 set.

User avatar
pocaloc
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:40 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by pocaloc » Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:21 am

So the over winding the bridge helped take that ear piercing treble out of the equation? I see where Lollar notes that he slightly overwinds his bridge.

User avatar
RocknRollShakeUp
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:47 am

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by RocknRollShakeUp » Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:54 pm

pocaloc wrote:
Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:47 am
I usually like the bridge position best. I don’t like the bridge sound on either a Jaguar or a Jazzmaster. I guess what I don’t like about it could maybe be described as harshness? I usually love sparkle and chime though. I guess I just want it tamed a bit.
You probably know this already, but in case you don’t, if you have the stock 1 meg pots, make sure you experiment with rolling the volume down and also the tone. If you play with the volume on 10 you’ll get a tone that is extremely bright, harsh and overly present.

I typically keep my volume between 7-9’ish, and tone 5-7’ish, depending on my signal chain/amp. I turn up the amp more, or use a boost, to make up for the tiny volume loss.
The bridge tones I get out of a JM are among my most favorites, sort of a more chimey tele’ish tone, to oversimplify the description a bit.
I’m mostly a bridge pick up kinda dude.

User avatar
soul1
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:25 pm

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by soul1 » Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:43 pm

I'm curious how the black bobbin compares to the Antiquity I

User avatar
rbrcbr
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 763
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Lollar “Black bobbin” or Novak JM-fat jm-v

Post by rbrcbr » Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:33 pm

ek11sx wrote:
Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:41 am
I had an issue with string balance on the black bobbins. The pole piece staggering was the culprit. Very pleasant sounding pickup to me though. Ended up moving to Novak to restore some of the sparkle
Hmmmm you know I think that I'm experiencing a similar thing with the string balance. Might also switch to Novaks then.

Post Reply