I've got a Jazzmaster I've built myself. It has "normal" Toltec A2 Jazzmaster pickups that I've wired to 1meg master and volume controls (audio and linear respectively). It's a barebones circuit without the JM rhythm circuit.
The guitar sounds great with that typical JM clarity and spank. But when I turn down the volume only a little bit (from 10 to 8 ) it seems to take out the treble frequencies first before actually dropping in volume. Is there any solution to this? Is this normal and one of the idiosyncrasies of 1 meg pots.
I've already wired it up 50's style and would like to stay away from treble bleeds. I use my volume knob extensively for cleaning up fuzz and drive. I would like to retain more treble down the volume sweep.
Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
- Guppy
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:51 am
Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
"wants the guitar with the most sustain, plays 20 notes per second"
- MayTheFuzzBeWithYou
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 2430
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:28 am
- Location: Linz, Austria
Re: Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
Have you tried it before with regular wiring or did you put the 50s wiring right in? And what capacitor(s) are you using?
Is there a reason why you‘d like to stay away from treble bleeds?
I‘ve a Treble Bleed in about every single one of my Offsets (except the new Late 60s Traditional Jaguar from Japan…or at least I haven‘t checked yet) - and love how they interact with Fuzz and taking back the volume. But maybe I‘ve just adapted to their sound..
- Guppy
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:51 am
Re: Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
I've experimented a lot with wiring mods and treble bleeds. 50's wiring usually works the best. I play alt rock with plenty of fuzz and use my volume knob to go from (fairly) high gain to clean. With treble bleeds I've found that the sweep to clean ends up in an unnaturally bright and spiky sound. I've experimented with different formulas (caps/resistors) but I've never found anything that leaves me with a somewhat balanced clean sound. Although these experiments have been done on strats/teles and Gibson style guitars.MayTheFuzzBeWithYou wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 7:59 amHave you tried it before with regular wiring or did you put the 50s wiring right in? And what capacitor(s) are you using?
Is there a reason why you‘d like to stay away from treble bleeds?
I‘ve a Treble Bleed in about every single one of my Offsets (except the new Late 60s Traditional Jaguar from Japan…or at least I haven‘t checked yet) - and love how they interact with Fuzz and taking back the volume. But maybe I‘ve just adapted to their sound..
If anybody has a treble bleed that works om a JM I would like to hear.
The tone capacitor is a .22 Malory. But I've never experienced a tone cap influencing the volume clean up.
"wants the guitar with the most sustain, plays 20 notes per second"
- GreenKnee
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:05 am
- Location: Sheffield, UK
Re: Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
I've had the same experience as you, Guppy, with regards to treble bleeds. With the volume rolled down a decent amount to clean up fuzz/ OD the sound is way too unbalanced.
I've found on Jags and JMs that a lot of the useable range of the pot is between 10 and 8, and after that it's pretty much past it. This is across 6 Jags that I currently own ranging from a '62 to the latest being a 2018 American Original.
I've found on Jags and JMs that a lot of the useable range of the pot is between 10 and 8, and after that it's pretty much past it. This is across 6 Jags that I currently own ranging from a '62 to the latest being a 2018 American Original.
- IceBlueBoogaloo
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2020 6:29 am
- Location: Orlando
Re: Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
I have a pair of these coming in with my order that I’m looking to experiment with as I also find the initial roll off useful but everything beyond that to be too muddy. I’m curious to see if variable bleed would provide useful results. You could try looking into them if you haven’t already.
- Guppy
- PAT. # 2.972.923
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:51 am
Re: Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
Well, the problem I have is that the initial roll off takes out way to much treble. Even without really reducing volume.IceBlueBoogaloo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 9:25 amI have a pair of these coming in with my order that I’m looking to experiment with as I also find the initial roll off useful but everything beyond that to be too muddy. I’m curious to see if variable bleed would provide useful results. You could try looking into them if you haven’t already.
"wants the guitar with the most sustain, plays 20 notes per second"
- IceBlueBoogaloo
- PAT PEND
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2020 6:29 am
- Location: Orlando
Re: Considerable treble loss within the first part of volume knob sweep.
I assume with a variable bleed you could at least reduce the initial roll off without entirely removing it. But I don’t think that addresses your issue with the curve itself.Guppy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 10:35 amWell, the problem I have is that the initial roll off takes out way to much treble. Even without really reducing volume.IceBlueBoogaloo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 9:25 amI have a pair of these coming in with my order that I’m looking to experiment with as I also find the initial roll off useful but everything beyond that to be too muddy. I’m curious to see if variable bleed would provide useful results. You could try looking into them if you haven’t already.