luau wrote:
StevenO wrote:
Surfoverb wrote:
Ugh seeing that pic makes me want to get the p90 sg again. I just don't like the dots, or rather I prefer the trapezoid inlays.
Was Pete using a p90 SG on 'Live at Leeds'?
Yep!
But to be fair, the p90s that gibson uses in the SG Classic don't quite sound like the vintage ones that Pete used. I prefer the vintage ones, but you can easily have them switched out for vintage ones from Novak or Lollar if you cared. They sound good, just a bit dull in comparison.
Pot values would be a factor too. Classics are 300k and I'd expect 500ks in a pre-early-70s Gibson. I'm not claiming that modern pickups are the equal of vintage pickups, far from it, but with a discrepancy in pot value that wide I don't think you can accurately judge two pickups. Especially for 'dullness'.
Actually, I believe the ones in mine are 500k. I'll go check though... If they're 300k pots, then that's good. It's simple to change the pots, especially if it means a better sound.
DON'T GET ME WRONG! I like the way the pickups sounds. I think they sound great with distortion, but with clean, in my mind, they lack, unlike a vintage example. They have a very nice smooth overdriven sound on the neck pickup and very nice, full distortion sound on the bridge pickup. The pickups also feedback very nicely, no squeals or anything like that.
Edit: I don't want to take remove the pots from my SG Classic, but I'm just going to go ahead and assume they're 300k like you said, luau. I took apart my SG before and I could have swore they were 500k the last time I removed them. I might replace them in the future...
