How many Les Pauls are in the group?

For guitars of the straight waisted variety (or reverse offset).
User avatar
RumorsOFsurF
Mods
Mods
Posts: 17651
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by RumorsOFsurF » Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:28 pm

OffYourFace wrote: .  I added a bigsby and later broke the headstock in a recording tantrum - there goes the resale value!  The repair is virtually invisible though.  10.5 lbs
Why does it seem that I hear about so many Gibsons with broken headstocks?  You never hear about someone breaking off a $trat headstock...always an SG or LP.  Just an observation. ???
Radical Left Lunatic

glimmertwin
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by glimmertwin » Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:43 pm

RumorsOFsurF wrote:
OffYourFace wrote: .  I added a bigsby and later broke the headstock in a recording tantrum - there goes the resale value!  The repair is virtually invisible though.  10.5 lbs
Why does it seem that I hear about so many Gibsons with broken headstocks?  You never hear about someone breaking off a $trat headstock...always an SG or LP.  Just an observation. ???
It's a design flaw caused by the angled headstock combined with the neck end truss rout.  It doesn't leave a lot of wood and since most necks are a single piece of wood through the nut/truss part of the neck, you have added weakness of the mahogany grain which is why the breaks tend to all look similar too.  There are various ways to combat this problem(including some Gibson has tried in the past) like changing the headplate to a stronger material, graphite rods in the neck joining the neck & headstock, sandwiching several pieces of neck wood together so the grains don't all run in the same direction, and creating a scarf joint at the neck angle - again to strengthen the grain. 

Of course it always boils down to people wanting the "original" guitar design regardless of how flawed it is....
"I enjoy the current state of offsetguitars hostility."

User avatar
RumorsOFsurF
Mods
Mods
Posts: 17651
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by RumorsOFsurF » Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:00 pm

Interesting...I've always wondered about that. 

Of course it always boils down to people wanting the "original" guitar design regardless of how flawed it is....
Sounds like what people say about us and our Jazzmaster/Jag bridges and trems! ;D ;D
They're wrong, though...
Radical Left Lunatic

User avatar
OffYourFace
Mods
Mods
Posts: 14534
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by OffYourFace » Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:08 pm

In the case of my Historic Custom, since it had a bigsby on it, it was really doomed!  I kinda threw it down face first.  This of course put a fast & hard pressure on the trem arm.  The impact, along with the force of the strings being pulled by the trem arm, caused this massive hard, heavy tension on the headstock.  It never had a chance. 

glimmertwin
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by glimmertwin » Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:01 pm

...oh ya, and the volute is the other method Gibson used to add a little more wood to that area...and you know how much people love volutes on their Gibsons >:(

...incidentally I haven't heard of anyone complaining about volutes on high end Martin acoustics...
"I enjoy the current state of offsetguitars hostility."

User avatar
chrisjedijane
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by chrisjedijane » Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:54 pm

RumorsOFsurF wrote: Why does it seem that I hear about so many Gibsons with broken headstocks?  You never hear about someone breaking off a $trat headstock...always an SG or LP.  Just an observation. ???
I broke the headstock off my strat... then again, I was being a bit Sonic Youth with it :D
"we lack the motion to move to the new beat"

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10159
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by luau » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:56 am

I came across a photo on lespaulforum.com a while back that was of an R8 (I think) cut in two right down the middle lengthwise giving a side view of the guts of the thing. It was something the factory did for sales reps, or for some display at NAMM, or something similar. I'll try to hunt it up this weekend because all it takes is a 1 second glance to go 'oh, that's why they break there'. Glimmertwin's explanation is spot on, but the picture really drives it home. The only thing I would add to it is that I think the typical mass of an LP body exacerbates it. I see far more broken LPs than I do SGs and I think the weight goes a long ways towards explaining why.
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
Pacafeliz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19183
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:34 pm
Location: Cococologne, Germany

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by Pacafeliz » Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:36 am

well.... mine are

1973 les paul deluxe
1973 les paul deluxe (converted to standard w/ late 60s full size humbs)
1974 les paul custom (temporarily out of service due to broken headstock...  >:()

oh and my 1st guitar, a '92 epi LP standard.

Pat.
i love delay SO much ...that i procrastinate all the time.

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10159
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by luau » Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:54 am

Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
OffYourFace
Mods
Mods
Posts: 14534
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by OffYourFace » Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:54 pm

luau wrote: Image
link.
no wonder... christ

User avatar
Stereordinary
Expat
Expat
Posts: 10672
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:55 am
Location: Vancouver, WA USA

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by Stereordinary » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:00 pm

glimmertwin wrote: ...oh ya, and the volute is the other method Gibson used to add a little more wood to that area...and you know how much people love volutes on their Gibsons >:(

...incidentally I haven't heard of anyone complaining about volutes on high end Martin acoustics...
I really like volutes!  My Greco LP copy has one and so does my Gibson Gospel acoustic.
Rhoney Guitars, 2010-2017, 2025?

User avatar
RumorsOFsurF
Mods
Mods
Posts: 17651
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by RumorsOFsurF » Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:28 pm

OffYourFace wrote:
luau wrote: Image
link.
no wonder... christ
Seriously, what a design flaw!  C'mon Gibson, you can do better.  I'll continue to use Fenders. ;)
Radical Left Lunatic

User avatar
chrisjedijane
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by chrisjedijane » Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:11 pm

I don't know why people are so against volutes - my avalon acoustic has one and I really like it.
"we lack the motion to move to the new beat"

User avatar
Pacafeliz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 19183
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:34 pm
Location: Cococologne, Germany

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by Pacafeliz » Mon Sep 03, 2007 4:21 pm

....well i prefer a volute over a broken headstock!!! >:(
i love delay SO much ...that i procrastinate all the time.

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10159
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: How many Les Pauls are in the group?

Post by luau » Tue Sep 04, 2007 3:31 pm

Sorry to hear about your Customs guys.  :(

I don't feel strongly about volutes although some sure do. My hand isn't ever going to get on it while I'm playing anyway so it's kind of a non-issue as far as that goes. I think part of the problem people have with them is that they coincided with a period of time during which other unpopular changes were made.
Bigger in sum than parts.

Post Reply