1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

For guitars of the straight waisted variety (or reverse offset).
User avatar
mgeek
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1436
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:03 pm

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by mgeek » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:04 am

sookwinder wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:17 am
Other than 18 strings is there anything new/innovative/magical about this guitar that could be patentable?

The heel join is unlike anything I've seen before , and I think they mentioned the thumb groove on the back of it being patented in the vid i posted

User avatar
Scout
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 962
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2020 3:26 pm
Location: Phillyish

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by Scout » Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:11 pm

There could be a slew of component and assembly patents on that guitar, besides the neck joint the bracing design, the bridge and its attachment, the truss rod, the overall shape just to name a few things.

User avatar
Unicorn Warrior
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Kentucky, USA

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by Unicorn Warrior » Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:06 pm

Honestly, I’d love to hear that thing.

Is the third string an even higher octave? What strings would achieve that?

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:31 am

Unicorn Warrior wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:06 pm
Honestly, I’d love to hear that thing.

Is the third string an even higher octave? What strings would achieve that?
mgeek wrote:
Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:01 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL_-KJgblew

2:30 or so to hear one! I can't really tell the difference between this and a 12 tbh, but maybe in person?
...and as mgeek says, it kinda sounds like a regular 12 string, making me think the strings are tuned with only one an octave higher (the other 2 the same as eachother).

Although, looking at the picture, it kinda looks like the top 2 strings are the same & the bottom one is thicker (which would be tuned an octave lower, no?)

Image
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

User avatar
andy_tchp
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8054
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:36 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by andy_tchp » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:45 am

Yeah looks like octave-octave-standard on EADG then three in unison for the B and e.
"I don't know why we asked him to join the band 'cause the rest of us don't like country music all that much; we just like Graham Lee."
David McComb, 1987.

User avatar
PorkyPrimeCut
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 24472
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig
Contact:

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by PorkyPrimeCut » Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:52 am

andy_tchp wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:45 am
Yeah looks like octave-octave-standard on EADG then three in unison for the B and e.
Making the statement "It sounds like a 12 string with a harp behind it" a little excessive. :whistle:
You think you can't, you wish you could, I know you can, I wish you would. Slip inside this house as you pass by.

User avatar
andy_tchp
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 8054
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:36 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by andy_tchp » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:00 am

PorkyPrimeCut wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:52 am
andy_tchp wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:45 am
Yeah looks like octave-octave-standard on EADG then three in unison for the B and e.
Making the statement "It sounds like a 12 string with a harp behind it" a little excessive. :whistle:
Yep.

Surprised they didn't throw something in the area of a .011"-.013" plain string on to get three octaves on the low 'E' along with some heavy wound strings to achieve octave down (as well as up) on the A, D and G strings - seems like an opportunity wasted.
"I don't know why we asked him to join the band 'cause the rest of us don't like country music all that much; we just like Graham Lee."
David McComb, 1987.

User avatar
Embenny
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 10363
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 5:07 am

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by Embenny » Thu Sep 03, 2020 8:42 am

andy_tchp wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:00 am
PorkyPrimeCut wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:52 am
andy_tchp wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:45 am
Yeah looks like octave-octave-standard on EADG then three in unison for the B and e.
Making the statement "It sounds like a 12 string with a harp behind it" a little excessive. :whistle:
Yep.

Surprised they didn't throw something in the area of a .011"-.013" plain string on to get three octaves on the low 'E' along with some heavy wound strings to achieve octave down (as well as up) on the A, D and G strings - seems like an opportunity wasted.
All you need to do is calculate the current tension, then use a string calculator to figure out if any alternatives would work.

I doubt the guitar would have playable intonation with any giant strings going down to a third octave, though. Three octaves on the same non-adjustable saddle is a recipe for an intonation nightmare.
The artist formerly known as mbene085.

User avatar
tdbajus
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:09 am
Location: Back in Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: 1971 Ralph Smith 18-String "Prototype"

Post by tdbajus » Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:10 am

How wide is that neck? I mean, there is a reasonable amount of space between the strings- a reason I will never be able to properly play a Rick 360 12; I suffer from sausage digits.

With the amount of pull it seems to be able to handle, did the luthier just use a 2x4 and round the edges a bit?

Post Reply