I'm plenty light... :)So lighten up
I just find it ironic that you are the one making the strong/subjective sweeping statements charged with emotion... yet get defensive when someone responds.

I'm plenty light... :)So lighten up
+1fullerplast wrote:I'm plenty light... :)So lighten up
I just find it ironic that you are the one making the strong/subjective sweeping statements charged with emotion... yet get defensive when someone responds.
![]()
I agree, most of my gear purchases have been that of oprotunityaen wrote: I suppose I would choose largely on comfort. But I like both tones equally. The jaguar bridge tone is similar to a teles. For me, a telecaster is more comfortable, though. If i were you, I'd wait and see what presented itself, unless you fell in love with a tele.
but for use on stage the jag is much more comfy. most tele players know about the forearm burn that occurs when you start to get a bit sweaty and you skin sticks to the finish, making the relatively sharp edge of the tele body feel like the edge of a brick.mynameisjonas wrote:
Well said.Nothing looks cooler than a Jaguar, but for my money, nothing sounds better than a Telecaster. To my ears, stock Jag pickups sound like thinner, brattier Stratocaster pickups, whereas a Telecaster has this "wood and wires" sort of a clang that just can't be beat.
Sonically, I think the Telecaster is one of the most versatile guitars ever made. Pretty much everything that can be played on a guitar has been played on a Tele at one time or another. So, if you can only do one of those two, go for a Telecaster. But life is much, much better with both. (and a Jazzmaster and yes, a good Stratocaster.)
true about the tummy cut, but unfortunately not the forearm. my experience with forearm burn actually comes from playing a '74 tele deluxe for several years.mjet260 wrote: Too true. I believe that the 70s Tele Deluxes (and reissues?) have the tummy cut and forearm contours.
Um...what's a "neck pickup"?FireAarro wrote: You can play ANYTHING on a Jaguar's neck pickup.