UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
Post Reply
User avatar
bussche
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:23 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:
Contact bussche

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by bussche » Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:46 am

I hate to say it but although she plays and sounds great, my Jagcaster is a bit of a beast:

Image Image
Top
User avatar
Bandarra
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:54 am
Location: Portugal

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by Bandarra » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:05 am

bussche wrote:I hate to say it but although she plays and sounds great, my Jagcaster is a bit of a beast:

Image Image
with an anodized gold guard that would be :? :? :? :?
Top
User avatar
R.S.Seizure
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 6:16 am
Location: Hong Kong (soon back home to London!)
Contact:
Contact R.S.Seizure

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by R.S.Seizure » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:48 am

no offset is ugly, they all have an inner beauty!
Top
User avatar
wardpike
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:05 pm
Contact:
Contact wardpike

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by wardpike » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:37 pm

You can really SEE the inner beauty with Bussche's guitar! :wtf:
Top
User avatar
bigsur78
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 541
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:37 am
Location: there is a town in south Ontario...
Contact:
Contact bigsur78

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by bigsur78 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:06 pm

bussche wrote:I hate to say it but although she plays and sounds great, my Jagcaster is a bit of a beast:

Image Image

:-* this guitar!!
Top
User avatar
knathan
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2925
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:
Contact knathan

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by knathan » Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:30 pm

Orang Goreng wrote:
the older brother wrote:We've done this before...and here's the previous winner
Way too early in the thread, J. Now it's peaked too soon ;).
I can't believe it wasn't the first posted- guess some of the fire has died with time...that is the winner though fo sho.
Top
User avatar
newdawnfades
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by newdawnfades » Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:16 am

Image
7 string shreadmaster...
Top
User avatar
chnlone
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by chnlone » Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:29 am

newdawnfades wrote:7 string shreadmaster...
WHY?! So wrong. also this:

Image

lol, that guy's been trying to sell this thing for months.
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/msg/1785923399.html
Top
User avatar
newdawnfades
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by newdawnfades » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:18 am

Floyd and Fender NO NO
Top
User avatar
Rich
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Virginia Beach,VA

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by Rich » Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:13 am

I have an ugly offset.

Image
Top
User avatar
Orang Goreng
Mods
Mods
Posts: 15876
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:56 am
Location: Amsterdam, NL - €
Contact:
Contact Orang Goreng

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by Orang Goreng » Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:15 am

Rich wrote:I have an ugly offset.
If you do, you've posted the wrong picture ;).
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man's a freak.
Top
User avatar
Rich
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Virginia Beach,VA

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by Rich » Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:20 am

Haha I guess I should have said "A lot of people think my offset is ugly".
Top
User avatar
SignoftheDragon
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2319
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Utah, USA
Contact:
Contact SignoftheDragon

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by SignoftheDragon » Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:56 am

This one fills me with deep shame as a surfcaster owner: the first incarnation (1990 jackson) of my favorite guitar, with a double-locking trem & pointy headstock.

Image

:-X

:-X

:k :k :k :k
Top
User avatar
null.fuzz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Frederick MD & a summer home on Mars
Contact:
Contact null.fuzz

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by null.fuzz » Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:38 am

SignoftheDragon wrote:This one fills me with deep shame as a surfcaster owner: the first incarnation (1990 jackson) of my favorite guitar, with a double-locking trem & pointy headstock.
That looks like they just gave up halfway through designing the thing.
So I pretend there aren't ten strings tied to all ten of my fingers.
Top
User avatar
fibreman
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 862
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:44 am
Location: Nr Manchester, England

Re: UGLY OFFSETS? Post Pics!

Post by fibreman » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:58 am

It's like they started with the neck and trem and designed a beautiful body. "There's something wrong with this, I can't work out what it is..."

I'm the most atheist person on the planet and even I want a jesusjag.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “New & Reissue”