"PROJECT '65" ~ FINIS! ~

Bringing your older offset back to life.
Post Reply
User avatar
Amber
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by Amber » Wed May 23, 2007 10:26 am

I imagine it would just be the price of a Total Vintage neck (around $190 with plain maple and rosewood) and it's $110 for the binding. I was going to go with a strat neck but I know it would bother me so much. Especially with a '65 decal.

glimmertwin
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by glimmertwin » Wed May 23, 2007 11:21 am

...why couldn't you just ask a luthier to make a one off JM dots & binding neck?  Cheaper than vintage and probably a pretty easy job for most competent luthiers.

Is there a true luthier in the house?
"I enjoy the current state of offsetguitars hostility."

User avatar
i love sharin foo
Mods
Mods
Posts: 5675
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:26 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by i love sharin foo » Wed May 23, 2007 11:35 am

fullerplast wrote: ILSF cut down a large CBS headstock for his Jazzblaster, and it looked great. I think he traced the JM head over it and cut it with a jigsaw or something. That would be alot of sanding if you choose to do it that way.
Yep. I traced the headstock of either my '62 or '64 and used that as a template. It was rough cut into shape with a Jigsaw and a bit used for cutting METAL. It isn't a very aggressive bit so the cutting was slow and it didn't splinter any. I then handshaped the rest using 80 grit sandpaper, then worked up to 600 or so with some filing in between.

Justin
This isn’t some kind of metaphor
Goddamn this is real

User avatar
mcjt
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 4295
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Côte-St-Luc QC

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by mcjt » Wed May 23, 2007 12:44 pm

a 'pro' (22 fret) warmoth neck with maple or rosewood fretboard is $157- i have always thought it was a good price!
Add $110 for binding, and you have $267- not too shabby! you could get it with a CBS headstock and whittle it down---
they *might* even do a 21 fret version and no Gotoh side adjustor.
Member 347

User avatar
Amber
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by Amber » Wed May 23, 2007 12:46 pm

They told me they could do Total Vintage with CBS headstock AND binding.

User avatar
mynameisjonas
Admin
Admin
Posts: 12721
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:55 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by mynameisjonas » Wed May 23, 2007 1:02 pm

Amber wrote: They told me they could do Total Vintage with CBS headstock AND binding.
really?? a few months ago i asked them if they could do a total vintage neck with CBS headstock, and they said no way.

User avatar
Amber
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by Amber » Wed May 23, 2007 2:15 pm

I'll email back to confirm.

User avatar
Amber
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by Amber » Thu May 24, 2007 12:29 am

Ken from Warmoth just got back to me. They had got it wrong and are sorry about the confusion. Sorry guys.  :'(

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by fullerplast » Thu May 24, 2007 12:50 pm

They BOTH look pretty cool:

Image

Image

OR

Image


This is kind of tough!  :-\
Q. Are we not men?

User avatar
Amber
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by Amber » Thu May 24, 2007 12:55 pm

Doug, I think the dots and binding looks better. The headstock still bothers me though. Personally it would keep bothering me.

Tommy at USACG told me they could do binding on a CBS headstock but it would cost about $180 more. Might be $200 I'm not sure but for the price you could sell the B+B for and the labour of sanding it down (I have a template for the headstock if you need it) might be worth it.

I took the time to do this (my photoshop skills aren't what they used to be):

Image

I think it looks much better.
Last edited by Amber on Thu May 24, 2007 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by fullerplast » Thu May 24, 2007 1:02 pm

No really...

I'm NOT looking for any other temporary neck! It would be foolish to spend any more  while I wait on a vintage neck. If there's ANY decision to be made here, it would be between this vintage B&B or this Allparts neck... but either are ONLY until a vintage neck comes along.

Not trying to be short, but this keeps coming up. I really DO appreciate the tips but my mind is made up. The whole idea here is to build a vintage guitar.

Besides...
but for the price you could sell the B+B for
Anything I get when I flip it only pays for it.
Q. Are we not men?

User avatar
Amber
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by Amber » Thu May 24, 2007 1:07 pm

If you get rid of the allparts neck I might be interested in it.

To be honest, it's gonna look good whatever you do.

User avatar
RumorsOFsurF
Mods
Mods
Posts: 17599
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by RumorsOFsurF » Thu May 24, 2007 1:39 pm

Blocks all the way!!  That neck is a beauty!! :? :? :? :?
Damn kids, get off my lawn!

User avatar
fullerplast
Mods
Mods
Posts: 12710
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:53 am
Location: In My Room

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by fullerplast » Thu May 24, 2007 1:47 pm

RumorsOFsurF wrote: Blocks all the way!!  That neck is a beauty!! :? :? :? :?
Yeah... and it's in GREAT condition too;  finish, frets, logo, nut, everything!

I'm curious to play the A width. It feels pretty cool just holding it (w/o strings).

It was once on a factory refin. It had a name, some numbers, and LPB stamped on the bottom of the heel.
Q. Are we not men?

User avatar
StevenO
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 17774
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm

Re: "PROJECT '65" Update! Pics!

Post by StevenO » Thu May 24, 2007 2:01 pm

I think I kind of like how it looks with the blocks and binding MORE so than with the dots and binding, and I love dots and binding necks. It just sort of looks as though the dots and binding neck is....missing something about it that makes you go "what a beauty!". Often times blocks and binding guitars look too busy for the guitar, for me, but this one doesn't. Everything looks good!

Post Reply