A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

For guitars of the straight waisted variety (or reverse offset).
User avatar
5L1V3R
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:49 pm

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by 5L1V3R » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:43 pm

oh then he must "like 'em rough"

User avatar
northern_dirt
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:03 am
Location: Scarborough

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by northern_dirt » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:54 pm

"it's got a neck like a spanish guitar finished in barb wire."

sounds like a good guitar for a beginner.. that'll work up those finger callouses..

(my first guitar was a cheese grater across my fingers, looking back it was a godsend)
'cleanest, best pleasure'

User avatar
mynameisjonas
Admin
Admin
Posts: 12871
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:55 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by mynameisjonas » Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:11 am

i've played a lot of faded SGs over the past month or so, and i have to say i really love the necks on them. i'm on the lookout for a good deal on a brown one, or maybe a 3 pickup white one.

idiotbear

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by idiotbear » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:24 pm

I can't recommend the brown SGs highly enough, Jonas. I love mine.

User avatar
chrisjedijane
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by chrisjedijane » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:39 pm

I agree with everything Idiotbear said too - I have one of the non-faded SG specials because I preferred the gloss finish, but you're being ridiculous if you think it's actually painful! Why not just give the neck a good polishing?

The Special is a great guitar - pretty similar specs to the Standard but for a lot less money. I also prefer the look - it's a bit more "rough and ready", plus they can really take a beating...
"we lack the motion to move to the new beat"

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10159
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by luau » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:57 pm

I love my SG Classic. Not quite the same but still fairly low budget. It was $749 on sale at MF IIRC. I did spend a few hours scraping excess glue from the frets off of the fingerboard with an x-acto this weekend though. There were a few errant fret file marks which I smoothed out the best I could and the board was incredibly dull/rough too so I went at with some 0000 steel wool. The workmanship wasn't that great really but it's looking pretty good now.  I've got an SG with a one piece body and neck that sounds great and looks pretty good for well under $1k. What's not to love?

If you can't play it as is and you can't really sell it, you don't have anything to lose: Roll up your sleeves and finish what Gibson didn't get paid to do.
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
guitardude
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: Suburb 'o Chicago

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by guitardude » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:58 pm

i've actually gotten used to mine's neck. bound is more slick though. but mines TOM bridge doesn't have saddles?  ???
...that I continuously confuse them..BTW once I built a jag with

idiotbear

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by idiotbear » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:33 pm

guitardude wrote: mines TOM bridge doesn't have saddles?  ???
WTF? How do the strings stay intonated?

User avatar
northern_dirt
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 14064
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:03 am
Location: Scarborough

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by northern_dirt » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:37 pm

one of these things maybe?

Image
'cleanest, best pleasure'

User avatar
5L1V3R
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:49 pm

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by 5L1V3R » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:37 pm

what guitar doesn't have saddles?  theres something wrong with it!

User avatar
dj_techa
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by dj_techa » Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:55 pm

5L1V3R wrote: what guitar doesn't have saddles?  theres something wrong with it!
Wild nomadic guitars.
"If you tell on us were gonna tell on you, thats ninja code."

idiotbear

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by idiotbear » Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:04 am

Let me be the first person to use the word "bareback".  :P

User avatar
5L1V3R
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:49 pm

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by 5L1V3R » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:16 pm

brokeback?  :o

User avatar
gutter rock
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 3131
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:39 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by gutter rock » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:20 am

I have played several faded series guitars and wouldn't have any problems buying any of them.  The brown SG has been in my head for awhile, however SG's are just a bit too small body-wise for me.  At least Gibson is trying to put some USA made guitars out at affordable prices, something Fender seems to be forgetting.  I have really been eyeing a 2 pickup Melody Maker, hard to believe that a new Gibson can be had for $400 and Fender's cheapest US guitar is a highway one at $750. 

User avatar
mikedm15
PAT PEND
PAT PEND
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:42 am

Re: A WARNING TO GIBSON LOVERS

Post by mikedm15 » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:40 am

i've got an sg special but the wine red one , and for me it works cool , i find the neck quite playable , it may be is cauze i've got really fat hands , i find the quality of my gibson way higher than my american tele , in terms of finish and hardware , they both had something in comon they were both poorly adjusted , but thats a blame on the store i think ;) i saw the faded ones and the finish did look kind of cheap , but the nitro finish in mine looks great i highly recommend it

Post Reply