Warning: those who know my style of build write ups know that I write a lot, I like to explain even the mundane because, to be perfectly frank, a lot of the issues I encountered ain’t fucking out there in the text books. Well actually they are there in the books but it is as if you have to already know about what ever it is to understand what is being written about. I have read a lot of the books (chapters in books) but it was only after I solved my problems and went back and re-read the books that I actually understood what the authors were trying to get across.
Amp building and the black magic behind it is quite intimidating to the novice amp builder. Yeah … if the amp works first time then get out the beers and celebrate. But in the majority of builds, even those from kits, there will be teething issues that need to be solved .In some builds (as in this one) issues arise that are problematic, are unknown to the builder, yet every “issue” is most certainly not unique to this amp build and have been worked through at some stage over the past 50 or 60 years.
When you are faced with a design/build problem you must follow a process of problem solving and root-cause analysis that allows you to solve the issue at hand and not introduce additional (unrelated) issues)
[In the car/manufacturing industry this is known as RED-X]
In short you have to be persistent, take things slowly, change one thing at a time and then see how the amp performs. No matter how many books by Gerald Webber you have they won’t really help if there is no logic to what you are doing from a fault/issue finding process. [to be honest I found no help in any of the Gerald Webber books I have - his books seem more from a perspective of wallpapering over a problem so you don’t notice it, rather than actually determining what the problem is and fixing it. But then again what do I know …..]
Another early piece of advice is to make sure you have someone you can bounce ideas off when you discover there is a problem with an amp you have just designed/built. People with a slightly different perspective can often see things you won’t … I talk from experience grasshopper …
For those who only want to see the amp pron, just page down to the photos and ignore the text…..
For those who like to read about build and have a spare 15 - 30 minutes … grab a beer , grab a cuppa tea, grab a coffee … what ever your poison … and follow me down the rabbit warren that is amp designing/building/fault finding.
The Genesis
About 12 months back I was in the middle of my Champ Reverb – on steroids (using an EL34 rather than a 6V6) build and I started to think about what was going to be my next amp project. Given that up until then the three builds I had undertaken were Single Ended amps, the next logical step was jumping head first into a Push-Pull amp.
As I thought about this next project a number of factors started to gel as to the specs of what I wanted the amp project to be. To a certain degree these have been influenced by the amps I already have and the fact that I wanted a design my nephew could build so he could have an amp that he could gig with in the future.
The initial specs were:
- power to be somewhere between 25 – 50 watts
- Single channel
- with reverb and tremolo
- small footprint
- must weigh less than a Deluxe Reverb (BFDR are 16kg, SFDR are 18kg)
- must have a BRIGHT switch and a MIDS switch
- switchable NFB
- must sound shit-hot
- must be a valve only amp
Cabinet and Chassis
I like Fender BF style amps from a visual perspective and which lead to the conclusion that a Princeton Reverb size amp may fit the bill, although it could be a tight squeeze getting everything in that chassis that I wanted.
I source my amp chassis from a “guy in Thailand”, who also sells on ebay. They are first class and fit the cabinets perfectly that I get from MOJO in the States.
Valves & circuitry
Power Amp section
I had decided on using two EL34 (6CA7) power valves. I have a medium size stash of NOS Mullard early 60s EL34s plus some late 60s RCA manufactured 6CA7s.
There are various methods of biasing designs that can be used for the power valves. I quite like the sound of a cathode biased valve amp. Even though cathode biased amps are said to have a slower attack than fixed biased amps, I have liked the sound they achieved in my previous SE amp builds. Cathode biasing also has the advantage in that you can stick in another (new) set of roughly matched power valves and the system will effectively self adjust with no need to change anything. (assuming that the second set of power valves are in the same ballpark as the first set)
I went with a Mercury Magnetics transformer. I had used MM transformers in my previous builds and have had no problems with them In fact I can highly recommend them. I was limited to what ever MM had in a PT that would fit into the transformer “cut out” in the PR chassis. Fortunately MM had PT would fit into the PR chassis which had a HT (B+) voltage of 360V (and was suitable for a 240V wall voltage.). It could deliver enough current to power the EL34s, GZ34s and a host of twin triode preamp valves.
Perfect.
Preamp
I went for the usual Fender BF/SF set up as far as the preamp. A 12AX7 as the pre-amp valve. What I did add was the addition of a bright switch (120pF cap) as seen in larger Fender amps and a MIDS switch.
Fender have used a “scooped mids” approach in the BF and SF amps to get that “Fender Amp Sound”. Most medium size BF and SF amps do not have a mid frequency control, but rely on a 6.8k resistor to “loose” these mid frequencies to ground, thus creating the “Fender Amp Sound”.
Even the larger Fender amps that do have a Mids control only have a 15k variable pot. [as a side note the Vibrochamp uses a 15k mids scoop resistor, which reduces the mids less than in the DR or PR etc. This allows the VC to sound a little more ballsy than if it had the standard 6.8k set up]
If you look at Marshall, Vox, or any number of modern day “heavy sounding” amps, they all use a mids scoop resistor of anywhere from 15 – 45k. With the majority some where between 18 – 30k.
I decided to have a mids switch that when off would be the normal Fender style 6.8k mid scoop resistor. But when switched on it would add in an additional 15k (making a total of 22 - 23k). This would bring up a level of the mids that was both noticeable, tactile but not overwhelming. (or so I hoped !!!).
Reverb Circuit
Having been very successful with the reverb circuit I designed (read … stole sections from other amp designs) for the Champ Reverb, I stayed with the usual 12AT7 for the input into the reverb tank and a full 12AX7 for the reverb recovery.
I picked up some 2 spring full size reverb tanks from Belton (who make Acoutronics Reverb Tanks) while on a business trip to South Korea. Word of warning … do not travel through an airports X-ray scanners with reverb tanks as your carry on luggage without the understanding that you will spend half an hour trying to explain to the idiot airport officials what exactly a reverb tank is.
Tremolo
I was however a little more uncertain about the tremolo circuitry. After doing some graphic manipulations to a photo of a PR chassis I realised I could add an additional 12AX7 size valve as well as an extra control pot/knob to the amp set up.

I decided upon the VibroChamp style tremolo. I quite like the sound of it, it doesn’t have a “click” sound which is apparent in the designs that use a “cricket” and it doesn’t need any diodes or additional circuit board (as seen in many larger Fender amp designs).
The VC tremolo design is pretty simple and uses both triodes in a 12AX7. One of the issues that I was to find out later was that sourcing a potentiometer that is 25k Reverse Audio was near impossible, especially for someone living in Australia. I did have an old 25k RA pot that I had taken out of a 77 VC a couple of years back, but I did want to locate some new pots… so the search was on.
Phase Inverter (PI)
That then left me with a full 12AX7 (or 12AT7) for the PI.
While looking at the various schematics I have of BF and SF Fender amps, it was apparent that in the majority they all used “Long Tailed” PI. The Long Tailed PI requires 12 components and a full 12AT7 and does have a level of gain to the amp Then I had a look at the Princeton Reverb circuit and it uses a Cathodyne style PI. This only needs 10 components and half a 12AT7 (or 12AX7). But on the negative side the Cathodyne style PI has no gain or even a very slight reduction in gain.
After doing some research there seemed to be a lot of negative comments about the cathodyne PI. More than one would expect. But it is used successfully in the PR (an amp I love) and I kept on researching this method of PI.
Eventually I decided to have a read of the book I bought from “The Valve Wizard” (http://www.freewebs.com/valvewizard/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) called “Designing Tube Preamps for Guitar and Bass”. I truly recommend this book and the author’s website. Forget any of the Webber books … if you want to buy a book to help you design/build a guitar amp, this is the one to start with.
Merlin had some good comments about the Cathodyne PI and the calculation/design example he used in his text book utilised EL34s with a HT (B+) voltage roughly where I thought I’d want to be. Also Merlin’s example used a 12AX7 as the PI valve, rather than a 12AT7 as used in the PR. I did notice a difference between the Fender PR cathodyne PI set up and that preferred by Merlin. I went with Merlin’s option.

So it was decided, I’d go with the Cathodyne PI which left half a 12AX7 un used. Easily fixed …. Just have another gain stage before the PI. Thus overall I would get additional gain using the Cathodyne style PI with a gain stage proceeding it, when compared to the the Long Tailed PI. A win-win as far as I was concerned.
During my investigations about PIs I had read that in the PR there is also a gain stage before the Cathodyne PI, but this is used more to get the combined “wet” and “dry” signal back to a half decent level, after the dry signal had been reduced so it wouldn’t swamp the wet (reverb) signal. (this applies to most BF/SF amps with reverb)
In my design I have an extra gain stage for the reverb signal, so the dry signal doesn’t need to be reduced before they are combined. This means that my gain stage before the PI can be a real gain stage (rather than a gain recovery) which will help drive the EL34s. Or so I hoped…. Remember I know jack-shit about designing amps !!!!
Filtering Caps and Rectifier
I had already decided upon a GZ34 rectifier. I have a nice stash of NOS Mullard GZ34s. My initial notion was to use a Cap-can for the filtering capacitors, as happens in the standard PR amp. There is a hole cut in the chassis of the PR for a cap-can. Cap-cans have just become available again and I notionally would use a 30/20/20/20 uF Cap-can. (I had used this on the successful CR03 build.)
So on paper (or at least in my mind) I had the rough design. Next I needed to draw up the schematic and start ordering parts that I knew may take a while.
I don’t know when it was but James (Jimboyogi) posted a thread about the Rhoney Tone Senior he was designing/building. It seems that James had the same sort of idea to build a Push-Pull amp which can be used to gig with, but James is about 6 months ahead of me. This was very fortunate for me … James has been a great source of help and advice through out this entire project. Let me say it right here … James … thanks mate for the help you provided over the past year or so, for a Collingwood supporter you’re still a half decent chap…

My first order was for the cabinet from MOJO. It is a standard Princeton Reverb type cabinet, which uses a 10” speaker. I went for red tolex this time. MOJO do great cabinets … never had a problem with any of their product. (although I wish they still had seafoam green tolex available)

The PR chassis arrived soon after: I needed to drill in an additional hole for the extra valve.

Given that the amp was to be anywhere between 35 and 45watts I needed at least a 50 watt speaker and decided upon a vintage Jensen C10N. I have really liked the 1960s Jensen ceramic C8R speakers I used in my Champ Reverb builds and had heard great things about the old 50s, 60s & 70s Jensen ceramic C10N. I managed to locate a early 60s C10N on ebay and purchased it. This is how the speaker arrived.

The idiot ebay seller had decided to place foam beads all through out the box and then pressed down hard when he closed the box up and sealed it.
Over the next few months I successfully located a couple of early 60s Jensen C10Ns that had been in home organs (as apparent by the two pin connector plug on the wiring, typical for organs of that era).