thedude99 wrote:Well, I agree with the bolded bit if we are talking about a definition that ties vintage to popular/desirable and possibly valuable. But if it is purely tied to the quality of the instrument then I don't think it really matters.Larry Mal wrote:I think predicting the future when it comes to "vintage" is a sucker's game. It assumes that the guitar remains popular in whatever forms of music come next, no guarantee. Should the guitar fall off the radar, we can look to the violin for a guess as to what could happen with the guitar. Granted, the violin has never been marketed the way the guitar was in terms of branding and name recognition certainly, but also violins look the same to the naked, untrained eye and electric guitars by design don't.
Think of it this way. We've all heard the theories that the bottom is going to fall out of the vintage market when the aging boomers or their families flood the market with their vintage collections and the younger generations have no interest in them. If that happens (not looking to debate if it will here - who knows), supply and demand kicks in and we get to a point where pre-CBS Fenders become readily available at a reasonable price - do they cease to be Vintage at that point? If the answer is no, that means we don't tie the definition of vintage to popularity and value then it opens the door to guitars being made today being considered vintage. Probably not the mass produced guitars of today, but the higher quality luthier made guitars? We look at student guitars and amps of the past as vintage today, so who knows.
Fair point, except for one simple and indisputable economic principle. Supply and demand. The world population in 1960 was 3,7 billion, this year 2015 we entered at 7,2 billion. And the future does not look all that good either. I suspect good old nerd-GAS will vastly surpass in depth knowledge.
How many pre-CBS Fenders exist in total, anyone knows?