difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

For guitars of the straight waisted variety (or reverse offset).
Post Reply
User avatar
mynameisjonas
Admin
Admin
Posts: 12871
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:55 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

Post by mynameisjonas » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:51 am

looks like my SG project is coming up sooner than i expected, and i need to decide what to do with the bridge situation. i really like the look of a wraparound, but i'm wondering if there's a chance i might run into intonation issues using a compensated one, if i use different string gauges than they were designed for..? (i don't want to use a badass or similar)
i'm also interested in the sonic differences, are there any? or is the the material of the stopbar/wraparound more crucial to the sound? i know aluminium is supposed to sound warmer and fatter than brass or steel.

all advice you can give will be greatly appreciated :)

User avatar
Superfuzz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 2889
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Prato, Italy

Re: difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

Post by Superfuzz » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:59 am

Applying the things said in the "beyond the bridge string lenght" thread..I can say a wrap around will increase some sustain and playability to the stock TOM..plus it should compesate (unless you use a very odd tuning)
I've seen some pros getting rid of the bridge/tailpiece system to go with a wrap around..especially the ones who solos a lot..(Angus Young, Jeff Beck, Pete Towshend, Tony Yommi..) Plus LP Juniors are well known for their playabilty..
Architecture students are like virgins with an itch they cannot scratch,  never build a building 'till are fifty, what kind of life is that?

User avatar
GUITARmole
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: Portland

Re: difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

Post by GUITARmole » Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:00 am

mynameisjonas wrote: looks like my SG project is coming up sooner than i expected, and i need to decide what to do with the bridge situation. i really like the look of a wraparound, but i'm wondering if there's a chance i might run into intonation issues using a compensated one, if i use different string gauges than they were designed for..? (i don't want to use a badass or similar)
i'm also interested in the sonic differences, are there any? or is the the material of the stopbar/wraparound more crucial to the sound? i know aluminium is supposed to sound warmer and fatter than brass or steel.

all advice you can give will be greatly appreciated :)
If you get an intonatable wraparound (like the Pigtail or TonePros) you can set the intonation and have it perfect...no issues whatsoever.  Trust me you DON'T want a badass tone-sucker...but you already know that  :D  If you don't go with an intonatable Pigtail or TonePros the tuning still isn't that bad but you likely won't be able to get it perfect unless as you said you use the correct gauge strings with the "lightning" wraparound bridge that's made for an unwound G string (the vintage correct ones are compensated for a wound G).

I also personally believe that Aluminum makes a big tonal difference.  It's warmer, fatter, and also more airy and woody sounding while still having good sustain.

User avatar
luau
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10159
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:07 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Re: difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

Post by luau » Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:29 am

GUITARmole wrote:I also personally believe that Aluminum makes a big tonal difference.  It's warmer, fatter, and also more airy and woody sounding while still having good sustain.
I'm going to test this theory soon. I have an aluminum stopbar on the way from RS for my Classic. My R6 w/aluminum stopbar is pretty airy/woody/and even a bit bell-like (for an LP anyway) but I haven't put a regular stopbar on it to evaluate the effect of that single part.
Bigger in sum than parts.

User avatar
ohm-men
Expat
Expat
Posts: 4342
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:01 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

Post by ohm-men » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:44 pm

Well, there are some difference imo. I got a wrap arround on the "Kimaxe" Hollowbody Jazzmaster/Surfcaster and it sounds very in "front" even a bit "strat" in a good way. String tension is very nice, but no overtones whatsoever. Tuning stability is very good. Ofcourse mine is a 25.5 scale one, so I guess an SG might differ a bit. But it's also "humbuckered" (toasters) overall very bell clear tones.
I think I get why the "solo" guys prefer the "wrap arround" vs. the "stop tail"
Proud "Young Router Jockey" And Rental service for "woodchippers"

User avatar
GUITARmole
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: Portland

Re: difference in tone/functionality - tune-o-matic+stopbar vs wraparound

Post by GUITARmole » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:56 am

A P90 SG with a wraparound can actually get some "Twang"!

Post Reply