Discussion of newer designs, copies and reissue offset-waist instruments.
-
SirJackdeFuzz
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:24 am
Post
by SirJackdeFuzz » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:44 am
Sounds like a stupid question, asked by a 3year-old . . .
. . . but i have a book about guitars (big book

) and in it they said that so and so guitars are offset, but they do not look like offset's to me !
Can anyone shed some light on this matter ?
Thanx

-
zhivago
- Mods

- Posts: 22453
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:18 am
- Location: London, UK
Post
by zhivago » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:52 am
Resident Spartan.
-
Naturality
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:03 am
- Location: Over There, look! >>>
Post
by Naturality » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:53 am
Yhere has been a number of threads about this, try searching before you post in future. The offset waist guitar type is explained here:
index.php?topic=1556.0
-
djetz
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 3951
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:55 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Post
by djetz » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:07 am
As far as I can tell, an offset seems to be whatever people here think an offset is.
For a reason I do not understand, the Mustang is considered an offset. The usage seems to be "any Fender guitar that isn't a strat or tele."
Personally, I think a Gibson Firebird, and especially the "non-reverse" Firebirds, are offsets. And an arguement could be made for the Gibby Explorer and possibly even the Ibanez Iceman... the Ibanez Talman is an offset in my opinion...
Last edited by
djetz on Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-=264=-
-
zhivago
- Mods

- Posts: 22453
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:18 am
- Location: London, UK
Post
by zhivago » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:14 am
djetz wrote:
As far as I can tell, an offset seems to be whatever people here think an offset is.
For a reason I do not understand, the Mustang is considered an offset. The usage seems to be "any Fender guitar that isn't a strat or tele."
I think the reason is what it says on the headstock decal....

Resident Spartan.
-
Naturality
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:03 am
- Location: Over There, look! >>>
Post
by Naturality » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:26 am
It's usually best to use paint to draw a line on the guitar like in the previous link
-
dinosaur
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:50 am
- Location: California
Post
by dinosaur » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:27 am
I thought that there was an actual Fender patent for the offset waist, with exact details. Isn't it the exact opposite of some arbitrary decision?
-
Naturality
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:03 am
- Location: Over There, look! >>>
Post
by Naturality » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:29 am
There is a patent, but I haven't seen it. It's somewhere on the web and the 'Continuously Curving' From the header of the page is from that patent
-
djetz
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 3951
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:55 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Post
by djetz » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:30 am
zhivago wrote:
I think the reason is what it says on the headstock decal....
Holy crap, you're right. It's been quite a while since I've handled a Mustang.
Though I still think it's only
slightly offset, in terms of waist angle. But it
does have an offset waist, you're quite right. I was thinking of Duo-Sonics and Musicmasters etc, which (I'm almost certain) are
not offset.
-=264=-
-
Naturality
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:03 am
- Location: Over There, look! >>>
Post
by Naturality » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:34 am
The 50's Duos and Musicmasters weren't Offset, but were then changed with the release of the Mustang
-
Soiouz
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Post
by Soiouz » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:59 am
The "Offset waist design" is definitely patented and is definitely not just "whatever people here think an offset is"...
...and as discussed here many times, the Mustang is as much an offset as JMs and Jags:

-
theswingincreeper
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:01 pm
Post
by theswingincreeper » Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:59 pm
According to the description, the Jazz Bass is definitely offset too, although it hardly ever gets mentioned. I've read somewhere it was invented to complement the Jazzmaster but eventually became far more successful.
-
StevenO
- PAT. # 2.972.923

- Posts: 17831
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm
Post
by StevenO » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:09 pm
Yep, a jazz bass is most certainly an offset.
-
Maggieo
- Expat

- Posts: 13478
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:36 am
- Location: Nebraska, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Maggieo » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:25 pm
theswingincreeper wrote:
According to the description, the Jazz Bass is definitely offset too, although it hardly ever gets mentioned. I've read somewhere it was invented to complement the Jazzmaster but eventually became far more successful.
And compliment the Jazzmaster it does!

“Now I am quietly waiting for/ the catastrophe of my personality/ to seem beautiful again.”- Frank O'Hara
I am not an attorney and this post is for entertainment purposes only. Please consult a licensed attorney in your state for legal advice.