New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Make it loud here.
Post Reply
User avatar
bubbles_horwitz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:07 am
Location: Los Angeles

New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by bubbles_horwitz » Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:16 am

i won this on ebay a couple weeks ago. the thing sounds absolutely incredible. i always thought the whole blackface thing was just hype, but the tone is exponentially better than my deville. i'm planning on building a 3x10" cabinet for it.
Image
i don't know if you can tell from the picture, but the front part with the grill cloth was warped and looked weird. i took it off a few days ago and the thing started crumbling to pieces. so i bought some new particle board, painted it black and stapled the old cloth on it. it looks much better now.

User avatar
JetBlue
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:00 am
Location: Cool, CA

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by JetBlue » Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:59 am

Ah, my dream amp. Congrats!  8)

Will your cabinet be closed-back?
Don

User avatar
mjet
Expat
Expat
Posts: 4226
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by mjet » Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:06 am

bubbles_horwitz wrote: i won this on ebay a couple weeks ago. the thing sounds absolutely incredible. i always thought the whole blackface thing was just hype, but the tone is exponentially better than my deville. i'm planning on building a 3x10" cabinet for it.
To be fair, the blackface mystique is usually discussed when comparing them to silverface-era (1970s) amps, not so much against modern amps like the Hotrod Deville etc. The gap between several of the blackface and silverfaces is much narrower, which is why there's so much back-and-forth about it.
"You eventually learn that true priorities are like arms; if you think you have more than a couple, you're either lying or crazy."

User avatar
bubbles_horwitz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:07 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by bubbles_horwitz » Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:08 pm

JetBlue wrote: Ah, my dream amp. Congrats!  8)

Will your cabinet be closed-back?
probably open back, but i haven't really decided yet.

User avatar
OffYourFace
Mods
Mods
Posts: 14533
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by OffYourFace » Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:32 pm

I had a '64 bandmaster, said fender elect. on it.  wish i kept it!  sold it many years ago for a now embarrassing $200  :-[

User avatar
bubbles_horwitz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:07 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by bubbles_horwitz » Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:12 pm

mine wasn't much more. only $350.

User avatar
OffYourFace
Mods
Mods
Posts: 14533
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by OffYourFace » Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:47 pm

bubbles_horwitz wrote: mine wasn't much more. only $350.
Reallly?  Good score!  They go for no less than $450 here for SF models.  Maybe because you're in LA, there a tons of Bandmasters around. (I grew up in LA, parents still live there).  I originally bought mine for $60 anyway so I can't complain :-) 

User avatar
bubbles_horwitz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:07 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by bubbles_horwitz » Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:24 pm

actually it was an ebay score. i was the only bidder, strangely enough.

User avatar
RedOrangeMorning
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:54 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Contact:

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by RedOrangeMorning » Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:58 am

Great find! I also got a '65 off ebay a couple months ago for slightly more ($400) than you paid. Like you, I was shocked at how incredible it sounded, even though I've been playing it through a cabinet with speaker issues. The vibrato channel is just amazing. Well, congratulations, and enjoy!

User avatar
eyesadrift
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:01 am
Location: hailey id

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by eyesadrift » Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:37 pm

wow thats awesome dude ive wanted a bandmaster for a while now myself mybe someday
that is if i can ever get off my pedal fetish

User avatar
spiffy chap
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 1127
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by spiffy chap » Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:02 am

:?

User avatar
zhivago
Mods
Mods
Posts: 22453
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:18 am
Location: London, UK

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by zhivago » Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:10 am

great looking amp :)

here's a pic of my '65 Tremolux

Image
Resident Spartan.

User avatar
bubbles_horwitz
PAT. # 2.972.923
PAT. # 2.972.923
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:07 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by bubbles_horwitz » Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:30 pm

what's the difference between the tremolux and the bandmaster? they look almost identical.

User avatar
mjet
Expat
Expat
Posts: 4226
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by mjet » Sun Aug 12, 2007 5:25 pm

The Tremolux has a tube (GZ34) rectifier, whereas Bandmasters have a solid state rectifier. And the Tremolux is 35w - Bandmasters are 40w. But they're essentially the same circuit, apparently (AA763) which I think also matches (or closely matches) some other models (Super Reberb??). I don't know enough about them to know how much they overlapped in sound, though...
"You eventually learn that true priorities are like arms; if you think you have more than a couple, you're either lying or crazy."

User avatar
zhivago
Mods
Mods
Posts: 22453
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:18 am
Location: London, UK

Re: New Amp: 1965 Bandmaster

Post by zhivago » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:24 am

mjet260 wrote: The Tremolux has a tube (GZ34) rectifier, whereas Bandmasters have a solid state rectifier. And the Tremolux is 35w - Bandmasters are 40w. But they're essentially the same circuit, apparently (AA763) which I think also matches (or closely matches) some other models (Super Reberb??). I don't know enough about them to know how much they overlapped in sound, though...
correct :)

I've never played through a Bandmaster so I can't be sure about the sound either...the main difference in sound is probably the extra compression to the note that the valve rectifier of the Tremolux provides

some people like it and some don't.

for example, in the band I play in at the moment, I favour a solid state rectifier...actualy, the whole amp is solid state! :D

but for my own project, I'll most likely use the Tremolux, as I could use the compressed sound.
Resident Spartan.

Post Reply