Felix wrote:
I think that is part of the problem I have with your post.
Your last line, the one I moved from an earlier post seems to make no sense to me. I only question you because of this section. You state that the AV is not better made than the CIJ, yet your following thought contradicts it.
I mean, what is your point?

Please, do
not miscontrue this as a flame, and rather consider it a point of mine that your argument is somewhat flawed in this debate. Or, maybe you meant to type something else. I don't always edit, so that may be the case.
Additionally, what is your contention with the nitro finish? Do you think it hurts the sound? I'm still not sure why you would feel the need to strip it completely. Plus,
and I may be incorrect here, the AV guitars are a mix of poly and nitro. In other words, I've heard on a few different occassions that the AV has a poly base and a nitro coat over it. If that is true, it would be unnecessary to strip it. Plus, what are you implying about the finish and its effect on tone? A curious point.
That's true about color selection being better though. Unfortunately, Fender America does not offer much variety. *sigh*
Are you sure about the woods? I mean, what is your evidence that the basswood used on early MIJ and CIJ guitars is in no way different from alder? I agree that sonically it can be a subjective debate, but you seem to be arguing opinion as fact here. I could be mistaken, but it seems that way. I love my CIJ JM, but I do think it feels and plays differently from my AV--not better, just different.
Anyway, that's an interesting take, and one that I traditionally agree with--just not for all the reasons you listed.
P.S.
Oh, and my comparison... You were contending that the CIJ, completely modded, could stand up to an AV. My point was that you need to perform those mods in order for your statement to be true. Not because I feel that way, but that your own words imply it. You point out the imperfections of the import, and highlight the need to alleviate them. Yet, that is an unfair if you don't consider the AV as an upgradeable item as well. Anyway, enough of my rant.
Dude,i never said Basswood and Alder are the same,i said they are both good and i dont see a guitar made out of basswood as a downfall.AFAIK All CIJ's are now Alder anyways.
Its simple,both AV and CIJ are made about as good as a guitar can be made and neither has a better finish or assembly than the other.
Its my personal feeling towards nitro that makes me dis-like it,i hate the white haze it has when touched.I have a vintage mustang that i am for ever trying to keep non-hazy.
As for the finish affecting sound.....i never mentioned it and have no idea what,if any of the differences would be.But it cant be too different as Fender used some kind of poly in the 70's didnt they!
My whole argument is based on the fact,yes
Fact that i or anyone can buy a CIJ,mod it and have a guitar equal to a AV,this is because the CIJ fenders are of a high quality to begin with,and once the CIJ electronics are replaced with AV(which are better imo) neither guitar has anything over the other performance wise....opinion wise is a different story it would seem!
Yes the stock AV electronics are more desirable than the CIJ,i never said they weren't.
So,as stock guitars the AV sounds better IMO,but with as little work as changing the pups in a CIJ it will sound as good quite easily.
Also,in Au shipping is not a factor as a lot of stores stock CIJ's and theyre about AU$1,100. which is kinda good for retail i spose.,I'm only ordering from Japan for the colors that i cant find here ATM is all.
Now,are we clear? I feel i've explained this clearly over and over and over in this thread.